bannedontherun
Roofer
Making it an offence to supply...What are the (actual practical) positives of them being illegal?
Making it an offence to supply...What are the (actual practical) positives of them being illegal?
True, but little action is taken against known suppliers, if it is the punishment is not a deterrent. Legalisation will mean those suppliers are more likely to be prosecuted for being under age or not paying tax or not registering as self employed etc... And they could still be prosecuted for supply to minors...Making it an offence to supply...
If nothing else, legalising gives these awful substances gives them an air off normality. If they were legalised, do you think less, or more people would use them?What are the (actual practical) positives of them being illegal?
I have no idea. Do we even know how many use them? I'd have to believe it would be more, but not necessarily many. Do you think people shouldn't have the choice to decide what they consume?If nothing else, legalising gives these awful substances gives them an air off normality. If they were legalised, do you think less, or more people would use them?
I do have a complementaire as does my wife and I used to have it for the kids when they lived with us. It's a little expensive if you are fit and healthy and think that will continue. My son had Asthma from birth, I have minor ailment requiring constant attention but the security of knowing that if something happens my family can get great care without paying for it was important for me. It certainly was less wasteful tha all the other insurances we have/had. Dental work is expensive, glasses, hearing etc...@Prof I see from another thread that you live in France. I didn't realise that. So do I, sorry if I came across as teaching you to suck eggs or whetever. Can you ask if you have a complémentaire ? I did for around 10 years before coming to the conclusion that it was costing more than I could justify, way more. Just didn't add up. Asking around, many people don't have one. Particularly the young. The joy of it though is you can sign up at the drop of a hat if you need.
Here I can get up, feel ill, go straight to a doctor, not even my own, and be seen.No available docs in my neck of the woods, the rural desert as they call it. And them retiring makes it even harder. Luckily, I've been registered with one since I arrived near 20 years ago. They retired but I was luckily shifted on to a new (and much younger! ) doc otherwise I'd be out of luck. The new doc is a bit limited but beggars and choosers etc. Fortunately I only need prescription renewals twice a year so no worries, touch wood.
About 6 months ago, my son got ill, went to the doc, had bloods the same day, results that evening, looked like HepA, doc arranged for an immediate trip to the clinic (45kms) for more tests. Came home. Got worse. Called emergency, ambulance out to hospital A&E (85kms). tested. Ambulance/taxi home. Tests showed not HepA. got worse, back to hospital for overnight observation and more tests (could only be checked in Paris). Home. tests came back as a mix of hep and glandular fever which they hadn't seen before. Back to hospital for 4 days. Off 3 months. All paid for by the state and complimentary insurance. Apparently, he was probably infected by the blood of an assailant during a scuffle a few days prior when he saved a young child (he's a cop).And, yes, the UK does seem to be in a bad way these days, not that I have family there these days. Not that I keep in touch with at any rate. Touch wood, I've done alright health wise in France - GP, dentistry, glasses, hospital, etc.
YesSo you would legalise crack cocaine, heroin?
The allure of rebellion may mean that many are tempted by drugs being illegal.If nothing else, legalising gives these awful substances gives them an air off normality. If they were legalised, do you think less, or more people would use them?
Then again, those that are up for a dabble but are put off by getting nicked, will start. More deaths and more junkies littering the streets.The allure of rebellion may mean that many are tempted by drugs being illegal.
w is making it illegal, “controlling it”?Yes
Criminal gangs make a fortune from it and people od because they have no idea of the purity.
If it’s controlled there would be fewer deaths, less money in the pockets of criminals and the tax could be used to educate and get people of drugs.
All drugs are effectively purer, cheaper and more readily accessible than before the war on drugs started.
Do you think adults should be legally allowed to carry firearms?I have no idea. Do we even know how many use them? I'd have to believe it would be more, but not necessarily many. Do you think people shouldn't have the choice to decide what they consume?
I said legalise it not make it illegal, are you on drugs?Ho
w is making it illegal, “controlling it”?
What you put in your own body should be down to you, gun control has nothing to do with whether drugs should be legalised or not.Do you think adults should be legally allowed to carry firearms?
If was legalised then the price and purity levels could be controlled.Ho
w is making it illegal, “controlling it”?
So would it be cheaper or dearer?If was legalised then the price and purity levels could be controlled.
No. I made a typing error. Stop being such a drama queen.I said legalise it not make it illegal, are you on drugs?
What you put in your own body should be down to you, gun control has nothing to do with whether drugs should be legalised or not.
[/QUOTESo you put noxious substances into your body, then when you have seizures, or need withdrawal treatment, who provides that? Bonkers.What you put in your own body should be down to you, gun control has nothing to do with whether drugs should be legalised or not.
They are and they do.Do you think adults should be legally allowed to carry firearms?
What you put in your own body should be down to you, gun control has nothing to do with whether drugs should be legalised or not.
[/QUOTE
So you put noxious substances into your body, then when you have seizures, or need withdrawal treatment, who provides that? Bonkers.What you put in your own body should be down to you, gun control has nothing to do with whether drugs should be legalised or not.
Where?They are and they do.
If you want my personal opinion (even though you didn't answer my question) I think they should be legally allowed to but no-one should do it.
hat noxious substances do we put into our bodies, every day?We all put noxious substances into our body everyday. even if you are limiting this idea to "illegal" drugs then people still do it and when they have seizures or need withdrawal treatment it is provided. Legalising it doesn't make a difference, however legalising it and then allowing these drugs to only be distributed by certain places (like pharmacies) will mean more control and the taxes can go to the costs that presently are not covered by the user.
Phthalates, VOCs, PFAs, Pesticides, formaldehydes, Lead, Mercury, food additives, air pollution .... The list goes on.W
hat noxious substances do we put into our bodies, every day?
So, most of the junkies in town are are zonked out, sweating and hallucinating, for the want of lead, pesticides and E-numbers?Phthalates, VOCs, PFAs, Pesticides, formaldehydes, Lead, Mercury, food additives, air pollution .... The list goes on.
Far more people die from the list I gave you than cocaine overdoses.So, most of the junkies in town are are zonked out, sweating and hallucinating, for the want of lead, pesticides and E-numbers?
You dont half talk some bollox for a Prof, Prof.Far more people die from the list I gave you than cocaine overdoses.
True, but not in this instance. How many people do you know who have died from a drug overdose? I bet it's less than you know who have died from cancer.You dont half talk some bollox for a Prof, Prof.