Boris and PMQ's
- Thread starter Brauny
- Start date
hackneyfox
Roofer
No he didn't, tht's been covered many times on here.
bnet
Roofer
no it hasn't.
that "tht's been covered many times on here" is almost a cliche of yours !!!.
hackneyfox
Roofer
Oh yes it has!!!
Try and do some research outside of bitchute and find anything that supports your claim. Needs to be something you can actually back up, not a 'I'm putting this on here for discussion, I don't know whether it's true'.
The other thing that's been covered a number of times is why matches are now stopped if someone in the crowd has a seizure etc.
It's in the rules.
Try and do some research outside of bitchute and find anything that supports your claim. Needs to be something you can actually back up, not a 'I'm putting this on here for discussion, I don't know whether it's true'.
The other thing that's been covered a number of times is why matches are now stopped if someone in the crowd has a seizure etc.
It's in the rules.
Last edited:
bnet
Roofer
Oh yes it as !!!!
ah ah, it used to be Youtube you used as an example you dick head. "Debunked".
"try some research". l probably, no, in fact l do ten times the the research you do. All you ever have is your agenda and you ignore absolutely everything that doesn't match it. Let me tell you a fact, there is no choice in elections, the two party system is a scam for the dumb so that thy believe they have a say in who is their slave master. You are so far behind you should be allowed near a keyboard.
"been covered" nothing gets "covered" on here, its just a load of piss taking and insults. Politics are bollocks, the sooner you understand this the sooner you ill understand the real world. They are all cunts, all corrupted financially or compromised. Its the led or the silver, thats the name of the game.. Just keep falling for this and keep backing one side, you're the ideal punter for them.
Everyone knew about Saville like everyone knew about Ted Heath, its all of them, there are some worse than others but every one of them is a dog. Sadiq Khan is up there with the worst and he is totally hated in City Hall, thats because they are close enough to see and not at a distance like MP's.
Wake the fuck up and stop talking out out your arse hole. They are not your friends, they despise the sheep like your more than the normal people.
hackneyfox
Roofer
You had 40 minutes of research time, clearly couldn’t back up your ridiculous claim so just ranted instead.
In 40 minutes can you back up your claim about Sadiq Khan? How can you possible know what those in City Hall think of him yet here you are claiming you have more knowledge than MPs who have dealings with him.
In 40 minutes can you back up your claim about Sadiq Khan? How can you possible know what those in City Hall think of him yet here you are claiming you have more knowledge than MPs who have dealings with him.
Last edited:
Running Fox
Roofer
You have a point, we should not judge . Its not like he has form?
bnet
Roofer
Are you fucking nuts ? don't answer that !
You think l spent one second checking the fact that Starmer wasn't on the committee investigated Saville. Its from memory, now if I'm wrong then its a committee he was on regarding later proven pedophilia. I've not checked but perhaps you can tell me which committee he headed regarding pedophilia and then tell me why the fuck you are defending..
"Rant", thats not a rant you silly weird apologist for pedophilia.
Do you think l spend time like you trying to prove points regarding shit you talk, youre dafter than l thought.
Anyone who supports pedophiles or their accomplices is as bad as them.
My niece works in City Hall, ok ? Hes fucking hated, what do you know eh ? fuck all thats what !!
Lets Go Brandon
edited to say - is it Operation Yew Tree that he headed and found nothing when it was later proved to be a cover up ???
Last edited:
hackneyfox
Roofer
I know someone who works closely with him, thinks highly of him.
www.google.com
I’m an apologist for paedophilia?
Really?
BBC DJ demands Keir Starmer apologise for role in sex abuse scandal
Sir Keir Starmer should apologise for his role in the scandal of men falsely accused of sexually abusing children, Paul Gambaccini (pictured right with Cliff Richard and Jimmy Tarbuck) said.
I’m an apologist for paedophilia?
Really?
Last edited:
F
Foxgolfer
Guest
Starmer campaigned for years and finally succeeded in making it easier to bring sex abuse to prosecutionI know someone who works closely with him, thinks highly of him.
BBC DJ demands Keir Starmer apologise for role in sex abuse scandal
Sir Keir Starmer should apologise for his role in the scandal of men falsely accused of sexually abusing children, Paul Gambaccini (pictured right with Cliff Richard and Jimmy Tarbuck) said.
I’m an apologist for paedophilia?
Really?
One can only wonder why some find that something to criticise him for .
jackieguaccamo
Flat Earther
Fuck me, now he's quoting Paul Paedo Gambaccini as some sort of moral measure. Who's next Jonathan King, Gary Glitter or Cliff Richard?I know someone who works closely with him, thinks highly of him.
BBC DJ demands Keir Starmer apologise for role in sex abuse scandal
Sir Keir Starmer should apologise for his role in the scandal of men falsely accused of sexually abusing children, Paul Gambaccini (pictured right with Cliff Richard and Jimmy Tarbuck) said.
I’m an apologist for paedophilia?
Really?
No-one needs to read any further.
bnet
Roofer
maybeI know someone who works closely with him, thinks highly of him.
BBC DJ demands Keir Starmer apologise for role in sex abuse scandal
Sir Keir Starmer should apologise for his role in the scandal of men falsely accused of sexually abusing children, Paul Gambaccini (pictured right with Cliff Richard and Jimmy Tarbuck) said.
I’m an apologist for paedophilia?
Really?
you don't seem to have any thought for anything except your politically daft ideas, kids, rape, murders, appear unimportant to you pushing the thoughts of Chairman Mao.
You just don't care about anyone else, its something that seems to run through your horrible bull shit and constant lies. You really come across sounding very much like a sociopath, at least.
jackieguaccamo
Flat Earther
When He starts quoting a well known paedophile as some sort of defence to his argument, you know he's full of shit.
Adumass
Bentleys Roofer
Have you looked at the article?
Gambocini is anti starmer, which doesn't put him on Hackney's side of the argument...
Birstallblue
Roofer
Starmer was on the cover up of the pakistani peado gangs
”its their culture” or summat
jackieguaccamo
Flat Earther
Yes, yes I read the article thanks. And I said, to quote a fucking nonce protecting his nonce mates is bullshit. Especially when none of them got done for their decades of perverted sexual abuse of young children. When it is well known within the industry and higher up exactly what they have been up to for decades. Dolphin Square anyone, here Kitty Kitty.
They're all in it together, they partied with MP's and alike noncing, abusing and killing children.
Last edited:
bnet
Roofer
The time you lied to cover up the rape of 500 disabled children, is there no limit to your disgusting lies for a political view.
This lie is far worse than you lying about Russiagate. Yet you deny this, lower than low !!
No shame !
COVERED THIS DID WE ?
Last edited:
hackneyfox
Roofer
The piece above doesn't actually claim that he raped 500 disabled children, you've done your research and gone off at a weird tangent again.
There were 500 known victims of Saville NOT 500 disabled children abused by him.
I certainly didn't lie to cover anything up, please stop throwing such stupid claims around.
I don't make exuses for paedophiles, I don't lie to cover them up.
If you're going to make either of these claims again then a cut and paste showing where I've done that would be helpful. It'll also keep you off here whilst you're trying to find anything to back up your despicable claims, we'll all be better off.
Again you're wrong about Starmer.
Who is Tony Marks? An investagative journalist of some repute like Paul Foot or more like Yaxley-Lennon?
The following links are somewhat more believable, although you'll claim that they're all controlled by Bill Gates.
fullfact.org
www.reuters.com
www.thesun.co.uk
Please expand on your latest 'research', you uncovering that the government trying to stop the right to protest.
The same 'research' that the BBC, C4 News, The Guardian* and Foxgolfer have been discussing for months.
*Fairly sure that it was also covered by many other TV News programmes and Newspapers but I don't have the time to check them all.
No shame on your part, hysterical and unsubstantiated claims against anyone who disagrees with you.
There were 500 known victims of Saville NOT 500 disabled children abused by him.
I certainly didn't lie to cover anything up, please stop throwing such stupid claims around.
I don't make exuses for paedophiles, I don't lie to cover them up.
If you're going to make either of these claims again then a cut and paste showing where I've done that would be helpful. It'll also keep you off here whilst you're trying to find anything to back up your despicable claims, we'll all be better off.
Again you're wrong about Starmer.
Who is Tony Marks? An investagative journalist of some repute like Paul Foot or more like Yaxley-Lennon?
The following links are somewhat more believable, although you'll claim that they're all controlled by Bill Gates.
Keir Starmer led the CPS when it did not charge Jimmy Savile, but he wasn’t the reviewing lawyer - Full Fact
Keir Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions when it was decided there was insufficient evidence to charge Savile, but he was not the reviewing lawyer on the case.
fullfact.org
Fact Check-No evidence UK’s Keir Starmer was directly involved in failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile
Speculation circulating online in 2020 has resurfaced on social media claiming that UK Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer was responsible for failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, the late TV and radio presenter revealed after his death to be one of Britain’s most prolific...
Logically Facts | A Global Initiative To Fight Online Mis/Disinformation
Logically Facts helps mitigate the risks posed by mis/disinformation to public health, public safety, election integrity, and national security by enabling platforms to operate in markets safely, responsibly and compliantly.
www.logically.ai
Sir Keir Starmer and the Jimmy Savile scandal - what was Labour leader's role when he was head of Public Prosecutions?
LABOUR leader Sir Keir Starmer, a former Director of Public Prosecutions in England and Wales, oversaw high profile criminal cases. But what was the role that the former Crown Prosecution Service …
www.thesun.co.uk
Please expand on your latest 'research', you uncovering that the government trying to stop the right to protest.
The same 'research' that the BBC, C4 News, The Guardian* and Foxgolfer have been discussing for months.
*Fairly sure that it was also covered by many other TV News programmes and Newspapers but I don't have the time to check them all.
No shame on your part, hysterical and unsubstantiated claims against anyone who disagrees with you.
hackneyfox
Roofer
Still waiting for the proof, any proof that shows I'm an apologist for paedophiles.
hackneyfox
Roofer
Just replying so that you can't edit your post later when you realise yoy've got your numbers mixed up, again.The time you lied to cover up the rape of 500 disabled children, is there no limit to your disgusting lies for a political view.
This lie is far worse than you lying about Russiagate. Yet you deny this, lower than low !!
No shame !
COVERED THIS DID WE ?
Or that you've made yourself look like a fool wrongly accusing me of lieing to cover up child rapes.
This is most likely the usual crap from fatboy and as he himself admits:The time you lied to cover up the rape of 500 disabled children, is there no limit to your disgusting lies for a political view.
This lie is far worse than you lying about Russiagate. Yet you deny this, lower than low !!
No shame !
COVERED THIS DID WE ?
"I'm not saying everything l share is true, how can l ?"
bnet
Roofer
HE WAS THE HEAD OF THE CPS THAT DIDN'T FIND ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CHARGE SAVILLE.The piece above doesn't actually claim that he raped 500 disabled children, you've done your research and gone off at a weird tangent again.
There were 500 known victims of Saville NOT 500 disabled children abused by him.
I certainly didn't lie to cover anything up, please stop throwing such stupid claims around.
I don't make exuses for paedophiles, I don't lie to cover them up.
If you're going to make either of these claims again then a cut and paste showing where I've done that would be helpful. It'll also keep you off here whilst you're trying to find anything to back up your despicable claims, we'll all be better off.
Again you're wrong about Starmer.
Who is Tony Marks? An investagative journalist of some repute like Paul Foot or more like Yaxley-Lennon?
The following links are somewhat more believable, although you'll claim that they're all controlled by Bill Gates.
Keir Starmer led the CPS when it did not charge Jimmy Savile, but he wasn’t the reviewing lawyer - Full Fact
Keir Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions when it was decided there was insufficient evidence to charge Savile, but he was not the reviewing lawyer on the case.
Fact Check-No evidence UK’s Keir Starmer was directly involved in failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile
Speculation circulating online in 2020 has resurfaced on social media claiming that UK Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer was responsible for failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, the late TV and radio presenter revealed after his death to be one of Britain’s most prolific...
Logically Facts | A Global Initiative To Fight Online Mis/Disinformation
Logically Facts helps mitigate the risks posed by mis/disinformation to public health, public safety, election integrity, and national security by enabling platforms to operate in markets safely, responsibly and compliantly.www.logically.ai
Sir Keir Starmer and the Jimmy Savile scandal - what was Labour leader's role when he was head of Public Prosecutions?
LABOUR leader Sir Keir Starmer, a former Director of Public Prosecutions in England and Wales, oversaw high profile criminal cases. But what was the role that the former Crown Prosecution Service …
Please expand on your latest 'research', you uncovering that the government trying to stop the right to protest.
The same 'research' that the BBC, C4 News, The Guardian* and Foxgolfer have been discussing for months.
*Fairly sure that it was also covered by many other TV News programmes and Newspapers but I don't have the time to check them all.
No shame on your part, hysterical and unsubstantiated claims against anyone who disagrees with you.
Do you get that, he was in fucking charge !!!
Stop wriggling and lying, l doubt that is possible with you !
"Reuters" fact checkers - thats the most desperate post ever !
How about apologising about you Russiagate lies, not a mention of that eh, wonder why
Club_B00k_Crutchless
Registered
Does the head of the CPS get that closely involved with the crimes that go to court?HE WAS THE HEAD OF THE CPS THAT DIDN'T FIND ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CHARGE SAVILLE.
Do you get that, he was in fucking charge !!!
Stop wriggling and lying, l doubt that is possible with you !
"Reuters" fact checkers - thats the most desperate post ever !
How about apologising about you Russiagate lies, not a mention of that eh, wonder why
bnet
Roofer
course he fucking does hes in charge ffs !
you really think the highest profile case was kept from him when he was in charge ?
are you nuts or just stupid ?
hackneyfox
Roofer
It matters because you accused me of lying to cover up the abuse of 500 disabled children.
In your rush to find another battle you posted some shite by someone we’ve never heard of and ten managed to read that incorrectly.
hackneyfox
Roofer
You clearly haven’t read anything about Starmer.
Another one of your posts that you don’t know whether is true or not.
Not a good look for someone who spend hours doing research.
Another one of your posts that you don’t know whether is true or not.
Not a good look for someone who spend hours doing research.
hackneyfox
Roofer
Still waiting for your proof of where I’ve been an apologist for paedos.
Still waiting for you to explain why I’d defend Prince Andrew.
Still waiting for you to explain why I’d defend Prince Andrew.
Club_B00k_Crutchless
Registered
Both babes. Why would he cover it up? I bet he's a Paedo as well. He has got quite big ears.