Explain this you lefty cunts

bnet

Roofer

"Evil to the core"

This is standard practice and you "pro-vaxxers" cover this shit up with your ridiculous "conspiracy theorist" claim. Have you know shame ? I've just exposed Hackney for the second time as being a disgusting liar.


*Let me point out "lefty cunts" only applies to "lefties" who are also cunts, not all lefties. Just in case there's lefties think that I'm insulting them, its just the "lefty cunts".
 
Last edited:
You're the one who spends all his time doing research and uncovering stories not covered by MSM (like the goverment trying to stop the right to protest), surely you can find the thread where I've shown how you've got the wrong end of the stick, again.
Hint, I've only replied to two threads.

Edited to make it easier, I've now replied to three threads.
 
Last edited:
What about us Cunts who are lefties tho? You've either missed us out or have forgiven us.
got me there, have l been pro-cunts or anti-cunts, l can't keep up ! Please advise, so l won't make the mistake of insulting all cunts randomly and without justification !

l apologise if any innocent cunts have been offended by my confusion and lack of understanding of cuntishness, l accept that cunts have feelings also..
 
For those who haven't seen it Bnet is claiming that I lied to cover up the rape of 500 disabled children.
We're talking about Saville, and it's reckoned he abused 500 people, weirdly bnet has somehow come to the conclusion they were all disabled.

Based on an incorrect rant by the very well known journalist Tony Marks.
Yes Tony Marks, come on, surely you've all heard of him, he must have won hundreds of prizes for journalism. He and Yaxley-Lennon have dozens of Pullitzer Prizes For Investagative Journalism.

Bnet is keeping quiet but he gets his next week for unearthing the fact that the government are trying to limit the right to protest. Apparently MSM haven't covered it.
 
Last edited:
For those who haven't seen it Bnet is claiming that I lied to cover up the rape of 500 disabled children.
We're talking about Saville, and it's reckoned he abused 500 people, weirdly bnet has somehow come to the conclusion they were all disabled.

Based on an incorrect rant by the very well known journalist Tony Marks.
Yes Tony Marks, come on, surely you've all heard of him, he must have won hundreds of prizes for journalism. He and Yaxley-Lennon have dozens of Pullitzer Prizes For Investagative Journalism.

Bnet is keeping quiet but he gets his next week for unearthing the fact that the government are trying to limit the right to protest. Apparently MSM haven't covered it.
It’s clear just from today the bloke is fucking nuts
 

"Evil to the core"

This is standard practice and you "pro-vaxxers" cover this shit up with your ridiculous "conspiracy theorist" claim. Have you know shame ? I've just exposed Hackney for the second time as being a disgusting liar.


*Let me point out "lefty cunts" only applies to "lefties" who are also cunts, not all lefties. Just in case there's lefties think that I'm insulting them, its just the "lefty cunts".
This is likely to be a pile of shit - as usual from our deranged one and as he admitted on 11 Jan

"I'm not saying everything l share is true, how can l ?"

However - as it suits his agenda be prepared for him to defend it as the absolute truth in his usual obnoxious style
 
This is likely to be a pile of shit - as usual from our deranged one and as he admitted on 11 Jan

"I'm not saying everything l share is true, how can l ?"

However - as it suits his agenda be prepared for him to defend it as the absolute truth in his usual obnoxious style
Disagree and you'll be accused of being a nonce, a paedo apologist, a pyromaniac or just having big ears.
 
For those who haven't seen it Bnet is claiming that I lied to cover up the rape of 500 disabled children.
We're talking about Saville, and it's reckoned he abused 500 people, weirdly bnet has somehow come to the conclusion they were all disabled.

Based on an incorrect rant by the very well known journalist Tony Marks.
Yes Tony Marks, come on, surely you've all heard of him, he must have won hundreds of prizes for journalism. He and Yaxley-Lennon have dozens of Pullitzer Prizes For Investagative Journalism.

Bnet is keeping quiet but he gets his next week for unearthing the fact that the government are trying to limit the right to protest. Apparently MSM haven't covered it.
so you are saying Kier Starmer had nothing to do with repressing the facts about Saville yeh ?

This "lack of evidence" cover up resulted in loads more children to be abused afterwards, you carry on defending the undefencable we all can see it, don't kid yourself that your disregard for abuse of children is not noticed by all.

Do you have any evidence that Saville didn't rape 500 kids, as it appears accepted by everyone even the liars who care for no one, like you. So you're defending Saville, Jesus Christ stop digging.

Does it matter if the children that have been abused, are disabled or not ? They are children man ! It appears that none of them matter to you, and its more important to defend an absolute establishment dog like Starmer. Sad, in fact, disgusting.

What about your Russiagate lies then eh ? avoided every post I've ask you to apologise for it so it could be put to bed. No moral fibre.

As l found out it as been held up by the House of Lords, you know this about the "right to protest" don't you you commie cunt, but its not been halted as it ! So shut up liar !!!!
 
For those who haven't seen it Bnet is claiming that I lied to cover up the rape of 500 disabled children.
We're talking about Saville, and it's reckoned he abused 500 people, weirdly bnet has somehow come to the conclusion they were all disabled.

Based on an incorrect rant by the very well known journalist Tony Marks.
Yes Tony Marks, come on, surely you've all heard of him, he must have won hundreds of prizes for journalism. He and Yaxley-Lennon have dozens of Pullitzer Prizes For Investagative Journalism.

Bnet is keeping quiet but he gets his next week for unearthing the fact that the government are trying to limit the right to protest. Apparently MSM haven't covered it.
you said "he hadn't" and "we covered this before". Correct !

Are you still saying Starmer didn't shut the Saville claims down then ?
 
Ooh twisting words.
You claimed he’d abused 500 disabled kids. I said there were 500 victims of Saville.
Go and do more of your ground breaking research and see which of us is correct.
 
You thought you’d brought us news that the government were trying to stop people protesting, the MSM and foxgolfer were going on about this ages before you did.
 
I've brought it forward, the balls in your court.
Unless you are going to admit your guilt by ignoring my post as per normal.
Brought what forward, that Saville abused 500 disabled children and Starmer covered it up.
Your proof?
Someone we’ve never heard of (that you managed to misunderstand).
My proof 4 or 5 links including the Starmer loving Sun.
 
As l found out it as been held up by the House of Lords, you know this about the "right to protest" don't you you commie cunt, but its not been halted as it ! So shut up liar !!!!
changing the subject tactic then eh :poop::poop::poop::poop::poop:
You didn’t find out, it was widely reported.
You reply then claim I’m changing the subject.

No mention of ears yet?
 
Very touchy on this some people (excuse the pun) saville was a cunt be it 5 , 500.
Yorkshire - England's biggest county.... For peadophiles.
 
He was a cunt, nobody on this board has ever said anything but. Nobody has ever defended him or tried to excuse him.

Yet according to our very own investigative journalist I have.
The fact he’s failed to back up these claims speaks volumes.
 
He was a cunt, nobody on this board has ever said anything but. Nobody has ever defended him or tried to excuse him.

Yet according to our very own investigative journalist I have.
The fact he’s failed to back up these claims speaks volumes.
Really, I can quite clearly remember the day he died.
Someone posted the usual R.I.P post and both me and Jackie called him out. We both got dogs abuse from you lot.
 
Really, I can quite clearly remember the day he died.
Someone posted the usual R.I.P post and both me and Jackie called him out. We both got dogs abuse from you lot.
Not from me you didn’t.
You lot? Which lot? The majority of people who hadn’t yet had the chance to read the details of his heinous crimes
I know who called you out and I’m sure he regrets it.
Since the proof became public nobody in here has defended the cunt and you know that. Stop trying to twist the truth to suit someone else’s agenda.

We all know your opinion of Starmer but do you honestly believe that he covered for Saville?
 
Last edited:
Not from me you didn’t.
You lot? Which lot? The majority of people who hadn’t yet had the chance to read the details of his heinous crimes
I know who called you out and I’m sure he regrets it.
Since the proof became public nobody in here has defended the cunt and you know that. Stop trying to twist the truth to suit someone else’s agenda.

We all know your opinion of Starmer but do you honestly believe that he covered for Saville?
I believe he was aware of the allegations due to Savile being high profile. I believe he would have had input into whether or not there was enough evidence. The level of his input and knowledge is certainly up for debate and i believe it is wrong to dismiss it by suggesting he had no knowledge.
 
Back
Top