Explain this you lefty cunts

hackneyfox said:
He was a cunt, nobody on this board has ever said anything but. Nobody has ever defended him or tried to excuse him.

Yet according to our very own investigative journalist I have.
The fact he’s failed to back up these claims speaks volumes.
Click to expand...
You are defending the person who should have stopped him raping more kids by lying (your specialist subject). So in effect you are defending him. You even made the point that all the kids weren't disabled implying it wasn't quite so bad ffs

Want to say something about your Russiagate lies eh ? thought not, I've ask you 20 times and you've ignored each one so, you can not deny that you are a liar can you.

Kier Starmer is a piece of shit in the same way Boris the cunt, Biden the retard and all the rest of the masonic animals are. They lie as if it doesn't matter, were as l think you must have some shame about your obvious lies, you have to be embarrassed otherwise you wouldn't ignore the question.
 
bnet said:
You are defending the person who should have stopped him raping more kids by lying (your specialist subject). So in effect you are defending him. You even made the point that all the kids weren't disabled implying it wasn't quite so bad ffs

Want to say something about your Russiagate lies eh ? thought not, I've ask you 20 times and you've ignored each one so, you can not deny that you are a liar can you.

Kier Starmer is a piece of shit in the same way Boris the cunt, Biden the retard and all the rest of the masonic animals are. They lie as if it doesn't matter, were as l think you must have some shame about your obvious lies, you have to be embarrassed otherwise you wouldn't ignore the question.
Click to expand...
I pointed out your mistake in claiming he’d abused 500 disabled children.
Only you have taken an implication from that.
Carry on without me, waste of time discussing anything with you.
Disagree and get accused of being a paedo apologist, no thanks.
 
hackneyfox said:
I pointed out your mistake in claiming he’d abused 500 disabled children.
Only you have taken an implication from that.
Carry on without me, waste of time discussing anything with you.
Disagree and get accused of being a paedo apologist, no thanks.
Click to expand...
and l said "what difference does it make" ?

not interested in talking to liars, I'll just expose them.

You support and make up lies about a peado supporter in Starmer, what's that make YOU then ? Tell me how I'm wrong !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top