As I've stated before they have been blatantly lied to."Two of Van Nistelrooys predecessors Brendon Rogers and Enzo Maresca, were known to be unhappy with the level of communication from senior figures about the clubs finances"
So, you know that for a fact do you ?As I've stated before they have been blatantly lied to.
Where is this from?"Two of Van Nistelrooys predecessors Brendon Rogers and Enzo Maresca, were known to be unhappy with the level of communication from senior figures about the clubs finances"
This is where it all kicked off with BR. Because he was assured there was money to strengthen and then couple of days before transfer he was told there wasn't any. He had already spoken to a few players. Enzo also said the same thing stating he was unhappy that he wasn't told the true factsSo, you know that for a fact do you ?
Tom Collomosse column in the morning paper also stating early next week we will know our fate on points deductionsWhere is this from?
With all due respect (i.e. none) unless you were party to the the conversation you don't know this to be a fact. What we know for sure is that at least 3 weeks before the season started he understood that we had to sell before we could buy. When he was actually told before that you would have had to have been there.This is where it all kicked off with BR. Because he was assured there was money to strengthen and then couple of days before transfer he was told there wasn't any.
And yet there are still some people who want to believe both this and that he had no say in who was brought in.He had already spoken to a few players.
tbf if you took a management job at a company having had upper hierarchy give you assurances about increasing headcount and then they told you a week after joining the finances are shite and there's a hiring freeze, you'd be annoyed too.does protocol suggest that they need to know?
They have been hired to do a job, and accepted a contract.
With all due respect (i.e. none)