She's releasing the Kraken!It certainly will be.
It never ceases to amaze me how people on here just KNOW everything about what is going on between people they have no access to. Even though they have zero idea of what is really going on behind the scenes. But here we go, we got someone who can tell you exactly what is going on. Holed up in Barrow.She hasn't shown any evidence to anyone, Inc the rest of the trump campaign.
Also she hasn't presented any evidence in court during the over 30 cases that have been thrown out of court.
In fact trump campaign lawyers have admitted in court they have no evidence, which is why the cases have been dismissed.
I presume you checked that is the official Twitter feed of Sidney Powell?
Girls calm down. You bite them pillows way too easy.I presume you checked that is the official Twitter feed of Sidney Powell?
Hey,It never ceases to amaze me how people on here just KNOW everything about what is going on between people they have no access to and even though they have zero idea of what is really going on behind the scenes.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzz
I'll make it simple for you.
Some have said, 'she hasn't shown any evidence to anyone, Inc the rest of the trump campaign.'
She is not on record for saying that. So for now, that is what is called 'speculation'.
I know this is tough for you, because this isn't a veiled attack, it's someone being honest.
You're repeating speculation, reformulating it as your opinion, but telling us it is a fact.
Go dig for yourself.
Tucker hasn't said she has no evidence.
But he does say that she hasn't shared it with him.
Why would she? It's going to court.
She's on record as saying that she didn't like the way Tucker communicated to her, and so refused to deal with him.
He's on record for saying that he hopes that she will produce the evidence within the next two weeks when it goes to court.
She may be a liar. Tucker never called her one, yet you say he did. Lies, huh? She may not have shared any evidence, as 'some' have said.
But Barrow mi lad, you don't effing know yet, do you?
I'll make it simple for you.
Some have said, 'she hasn't shown any evidence to anyone, Inc the rest of the trump campaign.'
She is not on record for saying that. So for now, that is what is called 'speculation'.
I know this is tough for you, because this isn't a veiled attack, it's someone being honest.
You're repeating speculation, reformulating it as your opinion, but telling us it is a fact.
Go dig for yourself.
Tucker hasn't said she has no evidence.
But he does say that she hasn't shared it with him.
Why would she? It's going to court.
She's on record as saying that she didn't like the way Tucker communicated to her, and so refused to deal with him.
He's on record for saying that he hopes that she will produce the evidence within the next two weeks when it goes to court.
She may be a liar. Tucker never called her one, yet you say he did. Lies, huh? She may not have shared any evidence, as 'some' have said.
But Barrow mi lad, you don't effing know yet, do you?
I have. It's a spoof accountI presume you checked that is the official Twitter feed of Sidney Powell?
BarrowFox it’s hard to tell if you are a liar or just sloppy.I simply repeated what had been said by Tucker, now I did say that Tucker had called out a lie, and the truth is he stopped short of calling her a liar, just. he did though claim that Sidney has chosen not to share her information with anyone.
It is a fact that in court rudy did say that they were not claiming election fraud.
It's also a fact that over 30 cases brought forward by the trump campaign have been dismissed.
It is also a fact that to date no evidence for massive electoral fraud has been shown.
So I do know some stuff, but best to shift the focus away from that laddie.
I'd be grateful if you could let us know when this case is coming to court, then we can all read about the claims and see the evidence.
You do know it's a spoof account rightBarrowFox it’s hard to tell if you are a liar or just sloppy.
You say “I simply repeated what had been said by Tucker.”.
But you didn’t, as you now have to admit. “I did say that Tucker had called out a lie, and the truth is he stopped short of calling her a liar.” Yes, Barrow. He didn't do what you said he did.
But what else?
Here’s what you also said to JG.
“She hasn't shown any evidence to anyone, Inc the rest of the trump campaign.”
Very clear, very certain.
But is that what Tucker said? No. He said that he’d contacted ’some’ people. He never said anything about contacting ’the rest of the Trump campaign.’ So you’ve lied again, or you’ve been very sloppy.
And look at your statement, offered to us as a certainty. (A fact?)
So I will repeat. Even if Tucker said this or that, (hearsay), how could you, not being involved with this small community, at the moment, KNOW what really has transpired?
I said earlier that you're repeating speculation, reformulating it as your opinion, but telling us it is a fact.
It’s worse than that. You're misquoting people, (possibly lying), repeating speculation, reformulating it as your opinion, but telling us it is a fact.
Most of us on here are sceptical. We’ll all agree that she could be lying. I don’t know if the truth will come out. But one thing is for certain, none of us should accept, blindly, the words of others. None of us know for certain, but some of us do try to tell the truth.
So how do you know everything about people on here and whether or not they know what goes on between people they have no access to, and whether they actually have zero idea of what is really going on? Maybe you are just speculating. Like they are.It never ceases to amaze me how people on here just KNOW everything about what is going on between people they have no access to. Even though they have zero idea of what is really going on behind the scenes. But here we go, we got someone who can tell you exactly what is going on. Holed up in Barrow.
A pile on? Really? What two posters?Quite the pile on here,
some justified, I did add my own spin to Tuckers claims, I would though challenge anyone to watch his monologue and not come to the conclusion that he was calling out Sydney. But hey you live and learn.
If you want to use this as an excuse to avoid engaging in a debate then there's not a lot I can do about that.
Now I originally said this:
She hasn't shown any evidence to anyone, Inc the rest of the trump campaign.
Also she hasn't presented any evidence in court during the over 30 cases that have been thrown out of court.
In fact trump campaign lawyers have admitted in court they have no evidence, which is why the cases have been dismissed.
The first paragraph is incorrect, Should have said Tucker has claimed he has spoken to members of the trump campaign, and they have not seen anything from her.
I would though challenge Rubbers assertion that I was:
repeating speculation, reformulating it as your opinion, but telling us it is a fact.
Well here are tuckers words, verbatim.
Does he call Sydney a liar, no he does though imply he doesn't believe her.
we took Sidney Powell seriously, with no intention of fighting with her. We've always respected her work and we simply wanted to see the details. How could you not want to see them? So we invited Sidney Powell on the show. We would have given her the whole hour. We would have given her the entire week, actually, and listened quietly the whole time at rapt attention.
But she never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of polite requests. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump campaign, people in positions of authority, they also told us Powell had never given them any evidence to prove anything she claimed at the press conference.
Powell did say that electronic voting is dangerous, and she's right, but she never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another. Not one
Why are we telling you this? We're telling you this because it's true, and in the end, that's all that matters.
The truth is our only hope and our best defense. It's how we're different from them: We care what's true and we know you care, too. Maybe Sidney Powell will come forward soon with details on exactly how this happened and precisely who did it. We are certainly hopeful that she will.
Snarky, nice lookI imagine that you can tell us. Afterall, you seem to know exactly what is going in the team, in each legal case, the communication channels.
Remember, no lying now.
No, it would be called taking the piss.Snarky, nice look
I haven't claimed to know exactly whats going on now have I, so would that be a lie?
Taking the piss by lyingNo, it would be called taking the piss.