RegiRoka
Roofer
Barrow... I don't usually do this. But I have to be honest, the desire to tell you that you are a fucking twat is pretty overwhelming. Luckily, I won't be succumbing to the desire.Taking the piss by lying
Barrow... I don't usually do this. But I have to be honest, the desire to tell you that you are a fucking twat is pretty overwhelming. Luckily, I won't be succumbing to the desire.Taking the piss by lying
Just so I'm clear,Barrow... I don't usually do this. But I have to be honest, the desire to tell you that you are a fucking twat is pretty overwhelming. Luckily, I won't be succumbing to the desire.
Let me introduce you to life on the Roof.Just so I'm clear,
if I'd had claimed I was taking the piss after my misquote that would have put me in the clear?
And I'm a twat for pointing out your hypocrisy.
Got it.
But isn't this all to avoid discussing the as yet unsubstantiated claims of Sidney Powel?
Let me introduce you to life on the Roof.
People take the piss. It's usually easy to spot. (Not always.) But that's how it works.
Now and then, people get serious. That's usually easy to spot too. (You were being serious.) D'ya gettit?
My hypocrisy?
"But isn't this all to avoid discussing the as yet unsubstantiated claims of Sidney Powel?"
As always, for me, there's loads worth discussing. Loads worth thinking about. And, ufortunately, the sneaking suspicion that we'll never really know the truth. But these days, I'm picky about who I want to discuss it with. High on the list of 'don't waste your time', are those that post misquotes and speculation that's disguised as fact.
Okay, fair enough.The thing is i also thinks there's loads worth raking through, and i agree when it comes to truths they are often elusive, we live in a world where despite having tools that make it easier to investigate its harder to get to the nub of things because of the weight of disinformation out there.
I did take tuckers words and add some flourish, that was a mistake, one I'll be sure to avoid in the future. I'm fairly new on here, but a long term lurker. I am though genuinely interested in finding out more about the world we live in and what really makes it tick.
peace
Or they prefer to present the evidence in a higher court where the judge is not an Obama placeman?In the ruling Judge Brann wrote that the Trump campaign had tried to "disenfranchise almost seven million voters".
He said his "court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations".
"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state," the judge wrote.
I guess that clears it up. If they are not going to present any evidence to the actual judge, i think most reasonable people can conclude there is no evidence.
Why do you "believe" that?Or they prefer to present the evidence in a higher court where the judge is not an Obama placeman?
Personally I believe that the election was stolen by the Democrats by massive fraud and that this is being covered up by the media and the 'deep state' working behind the scenes.
Sadly I think they might very well get away with it.
as a thought exercise, what is the benefit of bringing multiple cases to court with no evidence?Or they prefer to present the evidence in a higher court where the judge is not an Obama placeman?
Personally I believe that the election was stolen by the Democrats by massive fraud and that this is being covered up by the media and the 'deep state' working behind the scenes.
Sadly I think they might very well get away with it.
Not them again. Who/what is this deep state?'deep state'
Go to a bilderberg meeting and you'll see those who do their bidding and who reports into them.Not them again. Who/what is this deep state?
Last time I tried to get in Jon Ronson grassed me up to the bouncer.Go to a bilderberg meeting and you'll see those who do their bidding and who reports into them.
I went to the one near Watford a few years ago. Watching them leave was like a who's who of murderers paedos and sociopathsLast time I tried to get in Jon Ronson grassed me up to the bouncer.
I believe this is in order to bring the case in a higher court, eventually the Supreme Court.as a thought exercise, what is the benefit of bringing multiple cases to court with no evidence?
Didn't Georgia complete a recount by hand? its reported that the recount was a few hundred votes different to the original machine count.
so do we surmise from this that the massive fraud and vote flipping took place in other states, just not in Georgia?
Horrible phrase I agree. Too huge a subject to even begin to discuss in it's entirety but plenty of on line information if you want to look.Not them again. Who/what is this deep state?
I believe this is in order to bring the case in a higher court, eventually the Supreme Court.
The Georgia recount was just that, a recount. There was no attempt to validate the votes.
Horrible phrase I agree. Too huge a subject to even begin to discuss in it's entirety but plenty of on line information if you want to look.
Statement issued a couple of hours ago...
I agree with the campaign's statement that I am not part of the campaign's legal team. I never signed a retainer agreement or sent the President or the campaign a bill for my expenses or fees.
My intent has always been to expose all the fraud I could find and let the chips fall where they may--whether it be upon Republicans or Democrats.
The evidence I'm compiling is overwhelming that this software tool was used to shift millions of votes from President Trump and other Republican candidates to Biden and other Democrat candidates. We are proceeding to prepare our lawsuit and plan to file it this week. It will be epic.
We will not allow this great Republic to be stolen by communists from without and within or our votes altered or manipulated by foreign actors in Hong Kong, Iran, Venezuela, or Serbia, for example, who have neither regard for human life nor the people who are the engine of this exceptional country.
#WeThePeople elected Donald Trump and other Republican candidates to restore the vision of America as a place of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
You may assist this effort by making a non tax-deductible contribution to www.DefendingTheRepublic.org. #KrakenOnSteroids"
Sidney Powell
Possibly, this remains to be seen.She is working 'pro bono' as an independent lawyer and therefor not on the payroll.
In this capacity she can do things that prosecutors and federal lawyers can not. It is tactical.
She is asking for funding for such work in the normal manner. Transparent.
Partly your final point but also because any ruling at a lower level can be appealed.can you explain AFC why it is preferential to get the case up to the supreme court?
i get that the supreme court is stacked in their favour, but why deliberately lose at a lower court and risk the count being certified? why not present the evidence and take the win at the lower court?
is it that a supreme court ruling can then be used in other states?
Only following the initial machine count, the recount was done by people by hand.The systematic 'vote flipping' was done by computer and is a separate issue.
She is on his legal team. Just not employed by him, the White House or any federal agencies.
As I said it, she is 'independent' which allows her to do and say things that she could not do if she was on the payroll.
But the result wouldn't of been the same if a physical vote for Trump and been flipped electronically to Biden.No idea. I have no specific information on the Georgia recount other than it was simply a physical recount.
It is my understanding that there were no checks as to validity, just a recount of the votes so the results were more or less the same.
The allegations on vote flipping as I understand them are that the machine counts the votes correctly and then either the machine flips a number of votes or thd data is sent somewhere, possibly a 3rd country, where the votes are flipped.I do not know enough about the system to agree or disagree on exactly how the 'vote flipping' is carried out, other than it is done electronically before the physical count takes place,
The validity of postal votes is often suspect, addresses, DOB, signatures etc are rarely systematically checked. This is a very different issue to the organised 'vote flipping' that I believe has taken place across many states.
No proof at this stage, nor sources that I feel comfortable sharing, I still think it possible that the fraud will be buried very deep.