More clever protesters

Oh right. Someone is curing incurable diseases but his papers will probably never be published. Thanks for clearing that one up. Next.
see you're either naive or just trying to make me out a liar.

People who know me, know !

So its all important to try and discredit a link l shared, why ? have you got problems ? what's your point ? besides being seriously sad !
 
You've got the Head of Science and Research at a prestigious university, sending you a link (why?); which is utter bullshit.

Perhaps it didn't really happen?

If it did, then that person is a dimwit and shouldn't really be the Head of Science and Research at a prestigious university.

They can't even do basic fucking research on science.
It does take the football 'heard from someone who's in the know at the club' type of thing to a pretty impressive level.
 
I read the article and if true it raises serious concerns, one thing did jump out though,

The article states that they used Koch's postulates, this is a giant red flag that it wasn't written by an actual doctor.

Koch’s postulates were written before viruses were known to exist. Viruses aren’t like the bacteria that Koch was trying to find. Viruses need to take over a host cell to replicate and so a virus wont satisfy Koch's second postulate:

2. The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.

I don't know about the rest of it, but if whoever wrote it cant get the basics right you'd have to question the rest of the article as well.
 
I read the article and if true it raises serious concerns, one thing did jump out though,

The article states that they used Koch's postulates, this is a giant red flag that it wasn't written by an actual doctor.

Koch’s postulates were written before viruses were known to exist. Viruses aren’t like the bacteria that Koch was trying to find. Viruses need to take over a host cell to replicate and so a virus wont satisfy Koch's second postulate:

2. The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.

I don't know about the rest of it, but if whoever wrote it cant get the basics right you'd have to question the rest of the article as well.
Better take cover BF - there might be a barrage of abuse & much frothing on its way over to you...
 
see you're either naive or just trying to make me out a liar.

People who know me, know !

So its all important to try and discredit a link l shared, why ? have you got problems ? what's your point ? besides being seriously sad !
And the resident cunt continues to dribble
 
I read the article and if true it raises serious concerns, one thing did jump out though,

The article states that they used Koch's postulates, this is a giant red flag that it wasn't written by an actual doctor.

Koch’s postulates were written before viruses were known to exist. Viruses aren’t like the bacteria that Koch was trying to find. Viruses need to take over a host cell to replicate and so a virus wont satisfy Koch's second postulate:

2. The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.

I don't know about the rest of it, but if whoever wrote it cant get the basics right you'd have to question the rest of the article as well.

It's because the whole article was invented by someone. The names even change in different versions.
 
I read the article and if true it raises serious concerns, one thing did jump out though,

The article states that they used Koch's postulates, this is a giant red flag that it wasn't written by an actual doctor.
Koch’s postulates were written before viruses were known to exist. Viruses aren’t like the bacteria that Koch was trying to find. Viruses need to take over a host cell to replicate and so a virus wont satisfy Koch's second postulate:

2. The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.

I don't know about the rest of it, but if whoever wrote it cant get the basics right you'd have to question the rest of the article as well.
Hey, thats an impresive piece of research!
 
I read the article and if true it raises serious concerns, one thing did jump out though,

The article states that they used Koch's postulates, this is a giant red flag that it wasn't written by an actual doctor.

Koch’s postulates were written before viruses were known to exist. Viruses aren’t like the bacteria that Koch was trying to find. Viruses need to take over a host cell to replicate and so a virus wont satisfy Koch's second postulate:

2. The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.

I don't know about the rest of it, but if whoever wrote it cant get the basics right you'd have to question the rest of the article as well.
The idea is to separate and identify a virus isn't it ?

They never done this with C19 because they can't as its not what they say it is.

Just to confirm if there's some who don't know, viruses are part of our body, they don't enter our bodies to make us ill the 3 trillion are already inside us. We need then to survive.
 
Can you show any evidence of this? Why aren't they being lauded as some medical genius? Is it only for a select few?
If he's on about who I think he is, then I can vouch for three people that he has cured of stage 4 cancer, and are still cancer free to this day. If it's who I think it is, he is saving lives everyday. But you don't hear about him because his methods are hocus pocus in the medical world.
 
It does take the football 'heard from someone who's in the know at the club' type of thing to a pretty impressive level.
ok, as I'm apparently a liar because that's what suits some of your arguments.

This person helped me when l was diagnosed with terminal cancer and is a friend of a friend. l've been in touch for over 2 1/2 years and if any of you ever get in the position l was in you would be glad that there are good genuine people out there who want to help for no reward. If you knew the work and the success that this person as achieved you would be proud that they are from Leicester.
Some of the info l got and some that l still get takes hours to read as its often medical speak so l have to look up words every sentence in some cases. It doesn't matter if some no good cunt calls me a liar from behind a computer screen, its their problem. Some of the info I've been given as helped a lot of other people, but I'm a liar because you don't like my opinions. l don't have to defend what l say, please yourself, but those who know me know what I'm about.

So what, its only wankers who won't say it to my face, so they are what they are.
 
Last edited:
Well we can't all be as clued up as. I do try but I can't keep up, so when someone comes out with a statement about someone doing wonderful work I'm quite interested to discover more about it.
But do you not think that the way you are trying to belittle and mock everything Bnet says, would suggest to him that you are not really interested. It comes across like you are trying to ridicule him all the time. And it's not just you it's everybody jumping in and loving it.

I've said this before but you're talking to a bloke that had stage 4 cancer and was told he had months to live by the doctors. He said fuck this I'm going to beat this. He researched, found people that could help in non pharma ways, and fucking cured himself of cancer in under a year. Why would you be so flippant as to try and take the piss and ridicule someone that has gone to those lengths to prolong his life. When he talks about his beliefs and theories, I'm fucking interested in how he did it. And even if I wasn't interested I would respect what he's been through and fought off. Most people don't have the positiveness or dedication to save themselves when faced with death.
 
I'm happy to fight my own fights bumbag boy xx
that's the difference we don't have to team up, these weak lazy know nothing twats have too, they never say any of this shit to anyones face either. Its what they are and its why they act like they do. I don't give a fuck about them that's why they get it back off me all the time, they in general are not very bright. Life losers.
 
The idea is to separate and identify a virus isn't it ?

They never done this with C19 because they can't as its not what they say it is.

Just to confirm if there's some who don't know, viruses are part of our body, they don't enter our bodies to make us ill the 3 trillion are already inside us. We need then to survive.
The idea is to separate and identify a virus isn't it ? - Identify yes, separate no.

They never done this with C19 because they can't as its not what they say it is. - this is because as above its a fundamental misunderstanding on how viruses are identified.

Just to confirm if there's some who don't know, viruses are part of our body, they don't enter our bodies to make us ill the 3 trillion are already inside us. We need then to survive. - This is partly right, Humans are in effect symbiotic, many of our bodily functions only work because of the human biome. but viruses can and do enter our bodies some may be benign and some are not.
 
But do you not think that the way you are trying to belittle and mock everything Bnet says, would suggest to him that you are not really interested. It comes across like you are trying to ridicule him all the time. And it's not just you it's everybody jumping in and loving it.

I've said this before but you're talking to a bloke that had stage 4 cancer and was told he had months to live by the doctors. He said fuck this I'm going to beat this. He researched, found people that could help in non pharma ways, and fucking cured himself of cancer in under a year. Why would you be so flippant as to try and take the piss and ridicule someone that has gone to those lengths to prolong his life. When he talks about his beliefs and theories, I'm fucking interested in how he did it. And even if I wasn't interested I would respect what he's been through and fought off. Most people don't have the positiveness or dedication to save themselves when faced with death.
Well you've interpreted how you Want to. I ha e asked him about this before and didn't get any proper answer. If this fella can do as claimed I am genuinely interested. I just find it a bit strange that no further details are forthcoming when asked for and he's not hailed as a miracle worker.
 
Well you've interpreted how you Want to. I ha e asked him about this before and didn't get any proper answer. If this fella can do as claimed I am genuinely interested. I just find it a bit strange that no further details are forthcoming when asked for and he's not hailed as a miracle worker.
Because you are incapable of finding or accepting the truth, you live in a little nanny state style life were you don't have to think for yourself and critisise others that do.

You know nothing of the world we live in because if someone does something slightly illegal you call the police, if you get a pain, you go doctors. One of the first things l watched (l was recommended too) was called "don't fear the cancer fear the doctor". and there's never been a truer saying. You can't follow that because it involves thinking and trusting yourself...
 
Well you've interpreted how you Want to. I ha e asked him about this before and didn't get any proper answer. If this fella can do as claimed I am genuinely interested. I just find it a bit strange that no further details are forthcoming when asked for and he's not hailed as a miracle worker.
No I interpreted it how you wanted it to be interpreted. It was a smug comment. Why not talk to the bloke man to man and find out what he did, what happened, what changes he made, which ones does he think helped the most. What has he learnt on his journey. I'm sure he'd be happy to tell you if you were open minded and interested.
 
The idea is to separate and identify a virus isn't it ? - Identify yes, separate no.

They never done this with C19 because they can't as its not what they say it is. - this is because as above its a fundamental misunderstanding on how viruses are identified.

Just to confirm if there's some who don't know, viruses are part of our body, they don't enter our bodies to make us ill the 3 trillion are already inside us. We need then to survive. - This is partly right, Humans are in effect symbiotic, many of our bodily functions only work because of the human biome. but viruses can and do enter our bodies some may be benign and some are not.
if you can't or don't want to identify it then you can't make a vaccine.

Just as well because its NOT a vaccine is it.

The quickest vaccine ever made was 7 years, but most of the brain dead sheep believe in Santa still. Whatsmore this vaccine was patented before the "virus" was 'recognised".

Why the excuses, we are being fed the biggest load of bullshit in the history of humanity, yet morons lap it up.
 
No I interpreted it how you wanted it to be interpreted. It was a smug comment. Why not talk to the bloke man to man and find out what he did, what happened, what changes he made, which ones does he think helped the most. What has he learnt on his journey. I'm sure he'd be happy to tell you if you were open minded and interested.
Wrong again. I have asked before, both here and on the old board, and all I get back is the above, so yeah I might be a bit cynical if that's the kind of answer I get every time.
 
if you can't or don't want to identify it then you can't make a vaccine.

Just as well because its NOT a vaccine is it.

The quickest vaccine ever made was 7 years, but most of the brain dead sheep believe in Santa still. Whatsmore this vaccine was patented before the "virus" was 'recognised".

Why the excuses, we are being fed the biggest load of bullshit in the history of humanity, yet morons lap it up.
that's not what i said, though is it?

yes it has been identified but no you don't separate it first is what i wrote.
 
Well you've interpreted how you Want to. I ha e asked him about this before and didn't get any proper answer. If this fella can do as claimed I am genuinely interested. I just find it a bit strange that no further details are forthcoming when asked for and he's not hailed as a miracle worker.
Its all true , Bnet doesn’t make things up. Maybe it’s not the done thing to bandy personal details and info about said person just to satisfy somebodies curiosity or to “prove” it ?
 
Wrong again. I have asked before, both here and on the old board, and all I get back is the above, so yeah I might be a bit cynical if that's the kind of answer I get every time.
I get your point, but you do all jump on him as soon as he posts anything, I also know he gives back quickly. All I'm saying is out of all the people I know on here Bnet has a truly fucking remarkable story that is worth listening to if you are open minded and happy to question what you've been taught to believe. I wouldn't have had the strength or more importantly the positivity to fight cancer in the way he did.

And I think that is the difference, at the core of the debate he doesn't believe in the pharmaceutical industry and you have a belief in it. He found another way that cured him of stage 4 cancer, a way that medical people would say is voodoo and mumbo jumbo, but it worked. And there are 100's if not thousands of people that have gone down the same route and recovered from cancer. I also know people personally that I have begged to see the bloke Bnet is referring to, and they wouldn't, they went for chemo and died. Whether I agree with Bnet or not, whether I liked him or not, it wouldn't make any difference in the interest I would have in his story.
 
Back
Top