I’m avin a few £ on us if this happensLeicester victims of PSR quadruple jeopardy
Leicester City would like to make a managerial change; that much seems obvious. Ruud van Nistelrooy won four league matches in his tenure, two of which came after relegation, against teams that, like Leicester, were already down. They cannot move, however, because of Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR). Leicester already fear a vindictive 12-point deduction in the Championship next season, and paying off Van Nistelrooy would make their financial predicament worse. Any player who may be considered an asset, such as goalkeeper Mads Hermansen, will have to be sold, weakening them further. Russell Martin, considered a managerial target, has now taken the job at Rangers, and there is a worry that two other candidates, Danny Röhl, of Sheffield Wednesday, and Sean Dyche, may be lost to them too.
Leicester erred with Van Nistelrooy, and that’s what PSR does — it cements mistakes in place, with no second chances. So Leicester will be relegated, suffer a points deduction in the league below and conduct a fire sale of what little talent the club do possess, while being stuck with a manager who has shown little aptitude for the job. No one is arguing the club have not been run poorly, but PSR ensures they get no opportunity to change course. This isn’t double jeopardy, it’s quadruple jeopardy. It is almost as if the Premier League won’t rest until it kills a club, just to show it can.
No one is arguing the club have not been run poorly, but PSR ensures they get no opportunity to change course.
And in the process by deduction of points damage the competition of the division next season. All the while the big clubs can almost do what they likeQuite right. I understand the original intention of stopping clubs just spending their way to glory but in our case they are just punishing us for gross ineptitude. Isn't relegation punishment enough?
Apart from Everton & Forest who were caught but realised that the key was that if you were going to break the rules the key was to at least stay up and kick the can down the road.Other clubs operate within the rules OK
We may be "serial offenders" but what exactly have we done? Bought crap players at over inflated prices and paid over inflated wages to duds. Stupidity yes. But what harm have we done to anyone apart from ourselves? As someone said, if that is our crime then the law is an ass.It's like blaming the police for catching a burglar. Other clubs operate within the rules OK.
We are serial offenders and will have to pay the price, ironically the rules now tightened as a result of us exposing their poor drafting![]()
The players we bought this last season were never going to keep us up.We may be "serial offenders" but what exactly have we done? Bought crap players at over inflated prices and paid over inflated wages to duds. Stupidity yes. But what harm have we done to anyone apart from ourselves? As someone said, if that is our crime then the law is an ass.
Is it though?I’ve long said now we’ve made our bed and now we’re lying in it.
Whatever happens it’s all our own doing.
Whilst I don't disagree with the central points, you keep mentioning this (even though it pre-dated the 8th placed PL budget) but I am not sure of the relevance. Assuming you mean those for LCFC rather than KP's (and if KP's I don't see the relevance as it doesn't change the maths), those losses were add backs in PSR or are you alluding to something more nuanced about them?faced the covid loss of income
From a purely PSR perspective all clubs accounted for COVID losses and those losses were added back in the same way that spending on Youth, Women & Community are. The accounts were also averaged across 2019/20 & 2020/21 (because of the delay to the end of 2019/20). Our COVID losses were £13.8m in 2019/20, £36.1m in 2020/21 (there was also a small addback for COVID in 2021/22) and are not included in PSR.All clubs lost a huge chunk of revenue during the covid restrictions which is captured in the rolling three year losses. It's a significant loss of income, especially for a club operating at the maximum permissible budget, and this doesn't seem to have been factored in to the decisions, all of which kicked in since those covid-related shortfalls. PSR isn't new (started 2013/14) but all the charges have come about since 2021 which is why it seems important but maybe I'm missing something.
We can’t control what others have done we can only control what we do. Yes you could argue timing was bad and had Covid not hit we may well have finished 4th but it did hit. We were slow after the break, much slower than Yanited, but that too was our doing.Is it though?
I see where you’re coming from but had Everton been given the points deduction at the right time we wouldn’t have gone down?
Had we spent to the extent that Everton and Forest did we may not have gone down.
Had Man City been charged correctly then we would have had another season of CL football.
If we’d have abused the rules and sold 18 year olds for tens of millions or the training ground to ourselves we may not be facing these charges.
We are being made an example of when so many others have clearly got away with it.
If you want a Villa in Spain plan it and get one, it really is up to you.Full of opinion and very little fact.
Why don't we just wait and see what happens. PSR is broken but we have been as devious as the rule makers.
Anyway I want a Villa is Spain when I retire. Doesn't mean I will get it.
Thanks. You never know....If you want a Villa in Spain plan it and get one, it really is up to you.