Other Championship clubs apparently interested so we had to offer 4 years to get him. Hopefully on a lower salary.Four year deal
Laughable
No lessons have been learned
Perhaps we should have signed HaalandFour year deal
Laughable
No lessons have been learned
Apparently...Other Championship clubs apparently interested so we had to offer 4 years to get him. Hopefully on a lower salary.
Other Championship clubs apparently interested so we had to offer 4 years to get him. Hopefully on a lower salary.
Are you never happy? We needed a striker, he's a championship level striker, we couldn't get anyone else, not even Danny Ings!As soon as that is mentioned it's the moment we should walk away from the deal...because we should have already learned that lesson.
But we know we don't learn lessons.
He either wants to be here or he wants a pay day.
I'm happy we've got a striker. He may be a star, he may be shit, thats not the point.
I'm not happy we've given a 28 yr old a four year contract. Rarely in league one does a player get more than 2 years. Handing out stupid length contracts is a big part of what has got us in the shit and i can't believe there are still city fans out there who can't see it.
You may not have noticed but we have NO strikers. Of course we can only attract players through financial means, do you think people want to play for LCFC for love? They don't even play for Spurs for love! It's a good signing, now he has to perform. If his goals help to get us promoted then someone will be interested in buying him.Yes. That's exactly my point.
We are only able to attract that player through financial means.
Conversely our best performers are a completely different profile. Young. Want to play to prove themselves. To make a career.
Not to end a career with a nice next egg.
Compare and contrast any of our youngsters with BDCR.
I completely understand. I know a manager sees an ideal squad as a blend of youth and experience.
My point is fairly simple: we cannot afford players from a higher division.
We are a financial basket case. But we have a weak executive who continue to allow it.
Players are dropping one or two divisions to sign for us, mostly on long term contracts. They ain't coming for the love of Leicester or the love of league one.
Maybe they will work out, or more likely they will join the very very very long list of players we cannot shift. And so the doom spiral continues.
I think there would be a consensus on our worst 3 performers tonight being DCR, Burns and Cullen.
McCarthy as well if you'd asked at half time.
Not the youngsters, but the has beens. And we've just signed three more of them, who presumably will take the places of three of our youngsters.
Even if they help us get us promoted....then what?
I'm going bed.
Of course we can only attract players through financial means, do you think people want to play for LCFC for love? They don't even play for Spurs for love!
You have little idea about the financial state of LCFC and it really isn't your problem.
There are plenty who don’t know our financial position.Hello Mr Rudkin.
Do you ever take a breath, and try to understand what someone has written. Let me try again and make it tangible for you.
Take some of our best ever teams, O'Neills or Pearson's or Claudio's. How many of those players came from higher levels, and were at the end of their careers on bigger wages than our budget allowed? Off the top of my head incant think of a single one. Even the older heads in those teams didn't come for financial reasons.
Are you serious? There can't be a single Leicester fan who doesn't know our financial state. And yes. It is my problem if my club is a basket case. I don't want us to go into administration...the EFL will be vindictive as fuck and kill us with points deductions.
Can you do me a favour and put me on ignore.
I completely understand. I know a manager sees an ideal squad as a blend of youth and experience.
My point is fairly simple: we cannot afford players from a higher division.
We are a financial basket case. But we have a weak executive who continue to allow it.
Players are dropping one or two divisions to sign for us, mostly on long term contracts. They ain't coming for the love of Leicester or the love of league one.
Maybe they will work out, or more likely they will join the very very very long list of players we cannot shift. And so the doom spiral continues.
I think there would be a consensus on our worst 3 performers tonight being DCR, Burns and Cullen.
McCarthy as well if you'd asked at half time.
Not the youngsters, but the has beens. And we've just signed three more of them, who presumably will take the places of three of our youngsters.
Even if they help us get us promoted....then what?
I'm going bed.
Or you could put me on ignore. I enjoy reading the absolute bollocks you pretend are facts.Hello Mr Rudkin.
Do you ever take a breath, and try to understand what someone has written. Let me try again and make it tangible for you.
Take some of our best ever teams, O'Neills or Pearson's or Claudio's. How many of those players came from higher levels, and were at the end of their careers on bigger wages than our budget allowed? Off the top of my head incant think of a single one. Even the older heads in those teams didn't come for financial reasons.
Are you serious? There can't be a single Leicester fan who doesn't know our financial state. And yes. It is my problem if my club is a basket case. I don't want us to go into administration...the EFL will be vindictive as fuck and kill us with points deductions.
Can you do me a favour and put me on ignore.
Agreed – sounds like that transfer figure is way out.There are plenty who don’t know our financial position.
Only yesterday Nagerz was stating that we could be in admin by Xmas (?).
If that was the same give fix we manage to bring in new players and then turn down an offer for Page.
Some have been claiming that we owe £80m in transfers, a figure that is clearly somewhat out of date.
After Celtic & rangers wages in that league are close to needing a second job.And when O'Hora's former manager says that he 'couldn't stand in the way of a life-changing opportunity for the player and his young family', it makes me wonder whether he's talking about his chance to finally realsie his dream and play in England's Div3, or whether it's actually about LCFC's continuing contractual largesse.
We'll see...
This prof is a different breed I’m beginning to think he & melton are in a competition.Or you could put me on ignore. I enjoy reading the absolute bollocks you pretend are facts.
You have been saying that we have massive debts since I arrived on this site. I've questioned you over and over about it. All available evidence says we don't have very large debts. King Power have problems and that is why they want to sell us. But as you now say, no fan knows and we'll see.Agreed – sounds like that transfer figure is way out.
But the Page decision is an interesting one. Given the repeated examples of appalling judgement exhibited by Top et al over the past 8 years, I can't say that I have full confidence yet that it'll turn out to be the correct one for the Club as a whole.
As far as I know, the ex-Sunderland fella has no particular axe to grind and so when someone like him – who has first-hand experience of a poorly-run PL club suddenly finding itself in Div3 when still loaded with PL overheads and attitudes – sees a clear-ish route to financial insolvency, I pay some attention to those concerns.
Throw in a rumoured apparent desire for a quick sale – I guess we might learn more about that in a fortnight or so – and I can't say I'm anywhere near feeling relaxed about the finances. And when O'Hora's former manager says that he 'couldn't stand in the way of a life-changing opportunity for the player and his young family', it makes me wonder whether he's talking about his chance to finally realsie his dream and play in England's Div3, or whether it's actually about LCFC's continuing contractual largesse.
We'll see...
You have the right name.You're no professor. One of the first things we learnt was to answer the question asked, not the question you want. Give it a go.
I said look at those teams and consider which players in them came from a higher level when we bought them, and had to be enticed here by money. You've apparently decided to respond to a different question, although exactly what it is I'm not sure.
Ask sheff weds fans about the EFL and their point deductions. Stop and think before replying.
And once again, we DO have an idea. Do we know line by line the P&L...of course not.
But we know our latest published accounts. We know the rules by which the club have to abide in league one. We know the reduction in TV revenue. We know the parachute payment status. We know which loans we have with Maquarie. We know which players we've bought and sold and in some cases we know the fees. And best of all we know the points deductions and the losses reported in recent years. That gives you an idea of HOW the club operate, and based on all that evidence a self appointed professer should be able to have "an idea" of the clubs financial state.
As for moaning. I'm a football supporter. It's what we do. But for the record I've NEVER moaned about the young players. Not once. In fact this whole argument started because I was advocating more young players over buyer old players here for the money. But you keep making stuff up if it makes you feel superior.