How about someone who feels that being seen to be PC and non-racist is more important than caring about victims? Is that more in line with the way you feel?You seem to be mistaking me for someone who thinks it's OK.
Err no budHow about someone who feels that being seen to be PC and non-racist is more important than caring about victims? Is that more in line with the way you feel?
You just seem not to see it as important though.You seem to be mistaking me for someone who thinks it's OK.
Really? When have I said that? Should I be starting a thread on the subject every day to prove it?You just seem not to see it as important though
Again, when have I said that? It's the way it's brought up by some people with an agenda I object to.You would prefer that was never discussed at all
So lacking in self-awareness it's laughable.Really? When have I said that? Should I be starting a thread on the subject every day to prove it?
Again, when have I said that? It's the way it's brought up by some people with an agenda I object to.
'It's the way it's brought up' that you 'object' to?Really? When have I said that? Should I be starting a thread on the subject every day to prove it?
Again, when have I said that? It's the way it's brought up by some people with an agenda I object to.
But you only mention it when certain people are involved.'It's the way it's brought up' that you 'object' to?
I object to rape.
Rapists?But you only mention it when certain people are involved.
I comment on the facts.But you only mention it when certain people are involved.
Very selective ones.I comment on the facts
Hardly a strategy, is it every post? You're entitled to your opinion, wrong as it is again.As an aside - I would suggest that throwing the Nazi slur around as a deflection strategy ain't working for you. It just makes you look a bit of a dick.
How is it selective?Very selective ones.
Hardly a strategy, is it every post? You're entitled to your opinion, wrong as it is again.
Well, you do actually know what I'm talking about, but you do seem to only make a big deal about it when the perpetrators aren't white. Maybe it's just a coincidence.How is it selective?
Does it make a difference?Well, you do actually know what I'm talking about, but you do seem to only make a big deal about it when the perpetrators aren't white. Maybe it's just a coincidence.
Well, you do actually know what I'm talking about, but you do seem to only make a big deal about it when the perpetrators aren't white. Maybe it's just a coincidence.
I only make 'A Big Deal' of it when they aren't white?Well, you do actually know what I'm talking about, but you do seem to only make a big deal about it when the perpetrators aren't white. Maybe it's just a coincidence.
Take away your qualifier about victim colour (which is weird) then off the top of my head I can offer up the Catholic church, the care home scandals, the house of fucking lords.I only make 'A Big Deal' of it when they aren't white?
Fine
Give me 30 cases of rape gangs:
Where the perpetrators are white
Where the victims are not white
Where the rape is organised on an industrial sacle
Where Social Services, Local Government and the Police have covered it up yet all remain in their jobs.
I wait in eager anticipation.
0/10Take away your qualifier about victim colour (which is weird) then off the top of my head I can offer up the Catholic church, the care home scandals, the house of fucking lords.
If you or the resident toddler cannot come up with evidence then that's fine.Care to explain why they don't meet your criteria?
It reads whichever way you want it to.You made the colour of victims a thing on this thread. Which is really mental if you stop for one minute to think about it. it very mich reads like you couldn't give a fuck about the abuse of thousands of kids unless the perpetrators are Asian.
Btw, if you are unaware of evidence about the Catholic church scandal, or kids home abuse scandals, then you need to pull your head out your arse. I'm not gonna spoon feed you just cos you live in ignorance of major events, specially as you never accept evidence when you are given it.
Why just those reports? Try finding other reports yourself, they do exist.It reads whichever way you want it to.
Read the Telford or Rotherham reports and come back to me
Please try harder - you continue to just embarrass yourselfWhy just those reports? Try finding other reports yourself, they do exist.
You're right about there being many of these cases. But there are many reasons why things get covered up and many reasons why abusers choose their victims.You made the colour of victims a thing on this thread. Which is really mental if you stop for one minute to think about it. it very mich reads like you couldn't give a fuck about the abuse of thousands of kids unless the perpetrators are Asian.
Btw, if you are unaware of evidence about the Catholic church scandal, or kids home abuse scandals, then you need to pull your head out your arse. I'm not gonna spoon feed you just cos you live in ignorance of major events, specially as you never accept evidence when you are given it.
You’re wasting your time. These woke lot struggle with the most simple of questions when the question destroys their argument. It’s easier to call or suggest someone’s a racist rather than confront uncomfortable facts.You're right about there being many of these cases. But there are many reasons why things get covered up and many reasons why abusers choose their victims.
You mention the Catholic cases. Often, it was the leaders covering it up to save the reputation of the church. (Catholic people in authority covering it up, the abusers being Catholic and the victims usually being Catholic too.) Yes, I know that it's all terrible, no matter how it happens.
But if you want to pull up Pen4 here, I think you're wrong. It's hard to argue in this case that race hasn't played a part. Aren't there people who've admitted that it was the main reason why they covered it up? Which probably means that it was a main reason why it continued. I don't think it necessarly makes you a racist to point this out.
1. Yep.1. It’s easier to call or suggest someone’s a racist rather than confront uncomfortable facts.
2. Not one of them had anything to say when a Labour MP retweeted and liked a suggestion that those victims should just shut their mouths for the sake of racial harmony.
3. Now I see the Labour councillors have defeated a motion calling for an independent public enquiry into what went on in Oldham. They would rather have an enquiry by the very people who are part of the problem.
4. Horrible dirty scumbags the lot of them along with their supporters. Just plain filth.
You're missing the point. I don't think it should have been covered up. They're partly responsible for allowing it to continue and let some of the perpetrators evade justice. What I object to is some people only focusing on these sort of cases.You’re wasting your time. These woke lot struggle with the most simple of questions when the question destroys their argument. It’s easier to call or suggest someone’s a racist rather than confront uncomfortable facts.
Not one of them had anything to say when a Labour MP retweeted and liked a suggestion that those victims should just shut their mouths for the sake of racial harmony. Shows how their brain works. Not quite wired up right if you ask me. Now I see the Labour councillors have defeated a motion calling for an independent public enquiry into what went on in Oldham. They would rather have an enquiry by the very people who are part of the problem. Horrible dirty scumbags the lot of them along with their supporters. Just plain filth.
Keep diggingYou're missing the point. I don't think it should have been covered up. They're partly responsible for allowing it to continue and let some of the perpetrators evade justice. What I object to is some people only focusing on these sort of cases.