jackieguaccamo
Flat Earther
In April, but they won’t sell alcohol. And still you daft fuckers don’t think this is about control.
I think the level of daft to believe for one second this is happening is off the daft as a brush richter scale .In April, but they won’t sell alcohol. And still you daft fuckers don’t think this is about control.
For someone that comes across as not believing anything in the main stream media why do you believe stuff that’s in the main stream media?In April, but they won’t sell alcohol. And still you daft fuckers don’t think this is about control.
I think the authorities are working to destroy the social fabric of the indigenous working class.Maybe so. I'm just trying to understand what kind of 'control' the government would exert by allowing the pubs to reopen but preventing them from serving booze for a ouple of weeks. What could the illuminati - or whoever - actually accomplish by that? We'll all be getting pissed in pubs by June anyway, so what difference would it make?
Still don’t understand what they would gain from this apart from some very pissed off indigenous working classes.I think the authorities are working to destroy the social fabric of the indigenous working class.
Pubs, casual/private sector employment, inexpensive foreign holidays, cheap personal transport etc are all in the firing line.
More nasty shit to come, free speech, freedom of information etc.
Will the pubs still be able to serve Foie Gras, with Port Wine Sauce?
What?! Is this true? I hadn't heard anything...There's too much shaggin going on. The plan is to make everyone too knackered through work and too weak through lack of proper snap to be bothered with bonkin. Population reduction sorted
Seeing as no one anywhere has any evidence that covid spread is more likely around alcohol, there's no reason other than puritanical paternalism. These kinds of rules were taken to court in New York and thrown out and the owners managed to save their businesses.In April, but they won’t sell alcohol. And still you daft fuckers don’t think this is about control.
You heard it here first. Financial sector to be hit hardest
My local landlady would disagree with you.Seeing as no one anywhere has any evidence that covid spread is more likely around alcohol, there's no reason other than puritanical paternalism. These kinds of rules were taken to court in New York and thrown out and the owners managed to save their businesses.
There's no data to suggest covid spread is higher at 10:01 PM as opposed to 9:59 PM or two pints rather than three.
It's just bureaucrats being bureaucratic, copying the rules of others to make up for their own lack of imagination.
And quite right too!A former colleague of mine committed cultural and economic suicide when he did dry January after his missus shared her 'opinion' that it might be a good idea. The lawsuits against her are ongoing.
I'm fully reconciled to being an expert in nothing.I am an expert and so are you. We've both got an opinion and suppositions, we're both qualified to advise government it seems. I think the core issue is that no small business or shop should be closed at all, when they've demonstrated that they can function safely and effectively. Asking a bulk of the population to commit cultural and economic suicide on an opinion is a bit extreme. A panic measure has become institutionalised.
It's encouraging that this stuff is finally getting to court and emergency injunctions stopping this garbage are being issued. Not that it'll help at this point.
bu.. bu.. but.. the science!
bu.. bu.. but.. the lawsuits!