Man City’s goal

[essingtonblue]

How on earth has that been allowed to stand?

 

[Daz40]

How on earth has that been allowed to stand?

See Peter Waltons explanation after the game. I didn't know that rule existed.

 

[Thorney]

Unbelievable interpretation of the offside rule
As if Mings would not go for the ball hoping to get an offside decision,Peter Walton called it as offside then changed his mind when the Premier League gave their slant on it!!

 

[essingtonblue]

See Peter Waltons explanation after the game. I didn't know that rule existed.

Nobody did, not even Walton. Totally wrong

 

[Daz40]

So what they are basically saying is if Mings just stood there and let the ball go Rodri would've been offside. But Mings should've just cleared the ball anyway. Bad defending.

 

[essingtonblue]

So what they are basically saying is if Mings just stood there and let the ball go Rodri would've been offside. But Mings should've just cleared the ball anyway. Bad defending.

Don’t go along that line of bad defending at all. Have to agree with what Ferdinand said, that no one on that pitch would have known that rule.

 

[Thorney]

Don’t go along that line of bad defending at all. Have to agree with what Ferdinand said, that no one on that pitch would have known that rule.

Its known at Stockley Park as the Big Six Rule !!

 

[Daz40]

Its known at Stockley Park as the Big Six Rule !!

If that was the case Chelsea would've got a penalty last night.

 

[Thorney]

If that was the case Chelsea would've got a penalty last night.

Challenge outside the box,no interpretation of the rules for that one

 

[Daz40]

Challenge outside the box,no interpretation of the rules for that one

Yes but it was so tight that if there is a bias towards clubs VAR would've gone with the ref.

 

[Filbo65]

If that was the case Chelsea would've got a penalty last night.

Fucking hell – congratulations, daz!
Would've. Well done. Not would of.
Proud of you