That Shamina Begum woman

She will be back in the Country before long.

Next appeal is the Supreme Court.
Then the Supreme Supreme Court.
Followed by the Supreme Supreme Supreme Court.
Failing that a shot at the ECHR.
Then the Supreme ECHR.
Then the Supreme Supreme ECHR.
Failing that she'll be booked on a dinghy, destination Palais d'.Lineker
 
I do accept that she was manipulated my issue is the people that convinced her that being an enemy of the west is the way forward are still around and could do it again. Also we only have her word she is reformed and of course we have to discourage others in doing the same.
Why do “we” have to take the risk?
 
HughJanus said:
I do accept that she was manipulated my issue is the people that convinced her that being an enemy of the west is the way forward are still around and could do it again. Also we only have her word she is reformed and of course we have to discourage others in doing the same.
Why do “we” have to take the risk?
Click to expand...
I’m not saying it’s an easy choice, far from it. I’m just concerned at the double standards here.
She could even be an asset to the state with her knowledge and rehabilitation.
I honestly don’t know.
I just think it’s weird that we have, rightly, sympathy for the white girls that were trafficked in Rochdale etc but a girl of darker hue is regarded as being guilty of something. Doubly so when you realise just what a “sheltered” life she had by comparison.
 
Her job over there was to produce a few kids for the struggle. hardly a subversive menace to the state....
 
It's to make you think they are controlling shit like that, where in reality hundreds more twisted men are invited in every day and given a home and money and whatever else they fucking want. But don't worry about them, we're standing strong as a country on the dead eyed girl.
 
HughJanus said:
I do accept that she was manipulated my issue is the people that convinced her that being an enemy of the west is the way forward are still around and could do it again. Also we only have her word she is reformed and of course we have to discourage others in doing the same.
Why do “we” have to take the risk?
Click to expand...
Now Im no Mohammedan sympathiser, but could she really do that much damage?
 
Stamfox said:
I’m not saying it’s an easy choice, far from it. I’m just concerned at the double standards here.
She could even be an asset to the state with her knowledge and rehabilitation.
I honestly don’t know.
I just think it’s weird that we have, rightly, sympathy for the white girls that were trafficked in Rochdale etc but a girl of darker hue is regarded as being guilty of something. Doubly so when you realise just what a “sheltered” life she had by comparison.
Click to expand...
The Rochadale girls were victims

This girl is a criminal by her own admisssion.

Fuck her and her familiy
 
Stamfox said:
So why are white children, that were groomed by Asian men, victims, but a child of Asian origin not?
Click to expand...
Because she isn't a victim - she chose her path with enthusiasm - she is a criminal.

I don't recall girls in Rochdale sewing vests for suicide bombers

There is no equivalence between the two scenarios - buy a moral compass
 
She was a child.
Thick? Probably.
Naive? Probably.
Poorly parented? Definitely.

But that's kids. Loads of them are stupid, naive, easily lead etc etc. That's why we have age limits on loads of stuff.
Not quite sure any of us are qualified to say which kids are victims and which are responsible.


Pen4 said:
she chose her path with enthusiasm
Click to expand...
You should know what kind of people say things like that about 15 yr old girls...
 
Adumass said:
She was a child.
Thick? Probably.
Naive? Probably.
Poorly parented? Definitely.

But that's kids. Loads of them are stupid, naive, easily lead etc etc. That's why we have age limits on loads of stuff.
Not quite sure any of us are qualified to say which kids are victims and which are responsible.



You should know what kind of people say things like that about 15 yr old girls...
Click to expand...
Taylor swift ,15 ,says it all.
 
Law is not my strong point but didn’t she leave the country illegally, then joined a terrorist organisation and was part of their media campaign.
Also we exclude people on the basis of what they might do and we only have her word that she is reformed and no longer believes in the aims of the group she joined.

I wouldn’t want to be the person who agreed to her return if she assists with something horrible
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top