Richardvanles
Roofer
Absolutely, and anyone who they fear they can't control is destroyed using the tools they have to hand, mainly msn. Left and right don't matter to them. Left and right is nothing but a pantomime.
I remember being at Watford a few years ago watching all those bastards leave their bilderberg meeting...Absolutely, and anyone who they fear they can't control is destroyed using the tools they have to hand, mainly msn. Left and right don't matter to them. Left and right is nothing but a pantomime.
Nah. I’ll just wait for you to substantiate your outlandish nonsense.look you prick, if you want to make it personal take it off here.
go away no ones interested you bore.Nah. I’ll just wait for you to substantiate your outlandish nonsense.
Which of course you will, due to your extensive research*.
*reading cobblers on sites frequented by pub bores and people who think Tik Tok has a legitimate force in social change.
Sounds like you're just adding labels to well, label something. Marxism is Marxism. It either is or it isn't and these globalist certainly ain't Marxists.Richard. Regarding education and indoctrination.
You are a classic example. So far to the left and you don't even see it, or at least admit to it.
Thatcher was deposed 30 years ago, so I was discussing the post Thatcher period, Major preceded over a corrupt government, though pretty small scale by modern standards. Blair was a modern 'social marxist' and very effective in his nasty way, the rest were globalists for whom the well being of the people of this country was of no consequence whatsoever.
Marxism, as practised today is simply a tool used by the globalists to demoralise and control. Ironic given that the globalists are actually the arch capitalists.
All control regimes have the same end game whatever we call them, it’s control (slavery) of the 99.9%. The best basic description I’ve heard today is it’s Common Law v Maritime Law. If we have people fighting for Common Law then we are in the right war, plus of this is the case, good wins everytime. If we stretch this it’s the 0.01% against us, which is true and then you can start to expand from that point. This is more or less what I’ve been doing without realising it. Know the enemy!Sounds like you're just adding labels to well, label something. Marxism is Marxism. It either is or it isn't and these globalist certainly ain't Marxists.
Who are”deep state”?as i've said, i've not been interested in politics up until recently, but thinking back most PM's have been deep state controlled. Thatcher was acting out globalist plans by destroying national industries thinking back, so i'd say she was. Blair, Cameron and Heath without doubt and easily to spot DS controlled, i'd guess that all others were the same.
Six or seven years ago I got interested in the common law movement (through John Harris) clearly a lovely well meaning guy which I think led to his suicide. Common law is the only law you need. What else more could you want. Statutes have been put in place to penalise us to control us by financial loss.All control regimes have the same end game whatever we call them, it’s control (slavery) of the 99.9%. The best basic description I’ve heard today is it’s Common Law v Maritime Law. If we have people fighting for Common Law then we are in the right war, plus of this is the case, good wins everytime. If we stretch this it’s the 0.01% against us, which is true and then you can start to expand from that point. This is more or less what I’ve been doing without realising it. Know the enemy!
Think you'll find it goes back further than that.Magna Carta was the first step on the way to English Common Law and parliamentary democracy. For that reason it's importance can not be overestimated.
An independent court system and a functional parliament are required to make that work yet we have been systematically destroying both over the last 20-30 years. The pace of this change has been incredible, some have used it to their advantage, others have tried to pretend it isn't happening but the move towards corpus juris and tribal politics is obvious to anyone paying attention.
But like you say. Our rights and freedom have slowly been eroded away but in recent years it's happening on steroids. Now we're actually begging for it.Apart from the BBC licence fee of course...
Thanks, I was actually in the US working at that time so not up to speed with that. The riots made the news, but no detail.
Manipulating the courts for a political end is real 'banana republic' stuff. Never expected it to happen in the UK but it now seems common place.
This has moved into the Left or Right theme of that named thread in here. I would conside myself left wing and would tend to believe in socialist principles, although in it's purest form I know it would never work in a country like ours as there's too many people want something for nothing and those that want to have more than somone else as status is important to them. I just want a fairer society where people shouldn't need foodbanks, be left to sleep on the street etc. There's plenty to go round, we're a rich nation, but those in control and the MSM keep the plebs in check by chucking them dead cat stories about brown people in dinghies while continuing to give their chums billions in dodgy contracts and tax dodges.
The fact you point out what you think is decisive and destructive in socialism but fail to point out facts that are devisive and destructive in capitalism is disappointing.Club_boo. It is an unfortunate fact that some people are more successful in life than others.
Some need help in coping in modern society, this is where I support socialist ideas that help and support them to move forward and upwards in their lives, help with education and basic healthcare for example.
I abhor the modern socialist principles of turning those less successful than others into dependents of the state, primarily for political reasons.
For a country to support such principles requires a certain amount of 'wealth', this is most successfully accrued by 'capitalism', (very occasionally by 'natural' wealth/resources,) whether you approve of it or not.
Socialist principles should never be applied at government level, they are devisive and destructive and will destroy the wealth of any country foolish enough to let them into power.
There have been a number of actual live communist totalitarian states (and a number of attempted ones). I can't think of any where studying the history of how they came to be would make you think that your points 1 and 2 were seriously in play. Point 3 is more valid but the way you express it it;s not clear what you think the causality is (I mean, I think you are making a claim about causality, but it's at best only partially correct).What has happened in this country goes back 30 or more years,
It is classic marxism/communism.
1. Demoralize. Use a marxist dominated education system to produce an entire generation of socialists.
2. Destabilize. Use immigration, job destruction and intersectionality to disrupt society.
3. Crisis. Use violence, economic collapse and authoritarianism to produce a marxist/totalitarian state.
It should be obvious to all that we are now well into number 3.
Whether the marxist/totalitarian state is the end game or merely the means to implement something worse, remains to be seen.
I was talking about tax avoidance (which is quite legal) not tax evasion (which is illegal) so while illegal activities will continue in both set ups, as you point out, tax avoidance is something which our capitalist society have exploited for many years.Richard and Club_boo.
Croneyism, tax fraud and corruption are just as prevalent under socialist regimes as capitalist, check out Castro's billion dollar fortune, Maria Chavez is worth even more, check out the leaders of Hamas and Hezbollah, all looting their people blind.
It is a sad fact that a few people do obscenely well under capitalism, while some miss out entirely but it remains the only wealth creating system on the planet. To my mind, it is pretty simple capitalism creates the wealth, socialism spends it.
Until quite recently it was possible for a person of normal intelligence living in a western capitalist country to get a decent education, make the right decisions, work hard and have a good life. In many cases doing so in such a way as to make the lives of their children even better. For many people it was more than enough, that simply does not happen under socialism.
Spreading the 'wealth' more fairly is typical socialism. It fails because it's fundamental tenet is that business is simply the exploitation of others, I reckon some on here actually believe that.
Yeah... people trying to make sense of the world and life.Internet "experts". Don't you just love 'em.