Richardvanles
Roofer
Even though they didn’t accept themselves as they were.
Let that sink in…
Let that sink in…
Glad it’s sunk inYes, you're both right. Well done for taking the time to find out more about the issue.
Even though they didn’t accept themselves as they were.
Let that sink in…
Knots, tied in.Did you Phuket it though?
its a mental illness, nothing else.
A paedophile who needs locking up, happens to be trans.Bloke with three children already, rapes 14 year old and makes her pregnant.
And that’s the none so subtle difference from the BBC.Bloke with three children already, rapes 14 year old and makes her pregnant.
It's satanic foolery.In Scotland, the SNP is currently pushing through legislation that will basically give men like David Orton the right to freely enter women's spaces if they declare themselves to be a woman. The UN has urged Nicola Sturgeon to pause the bill, but Sturgeon is absolutely determined to push it through.
One day this insanity will be recognised for what it is, but there will be more victims like this 14-year-old girl before that happens.
Would it be ungentlemanly to suggest that the fragrant Ms Sturgeon may have started her life journey with goolies?
In Scotland, the SNP is currently pushing through legislation that will basically give men like David Orton the right to freely enter women's spaces if they declare themselves to be a woman. The UN has urged Nicola Sturgeon to pause the bill, but Sturgeon is absolutely determined to push it through.
One day this insanity will be recognised for what it is, but there will be more victims like this 14-year-old girl before that happens.
No-one ever been to a swimming baths where there's communal changing, tried clothes on in a shop?
There's pervs and paedos everywhere, being trans doesn't make anyone more of a risk.
It also doesn't make them less of a risk. But you know that already.No-one ever been to a swimming baths where there's communal changing, tried clothes on in a shop?
There's pervs and paedos everywhere, being trans doesn't make anyone more of a risk.
So you're in favour of singling out a whole sub-section of society because one or two pervs use it as an opportunity to be pervs?It also doesn't make them less of a risk. But you know that already.
There are certain contexts in which men have been separated from women throughout history and in virtually every country in the world. Why? Because the overwhelming proportion of sexual assaults are committed by men, the large majority of them against women. It's a basic principle of safeguarding that women should be kept apart from men in situations where they're vulnerable - changing facilities, hospitals, prisons, shelters, etc. This is so widely acknowledged and practiced that it is pretty much a universal truth.
Allowing men who claim they 'feel' like a woman (as if they have any idea what that means) into those spaces puts those women at risk. It's putting the 'feelings' of men above the safety of women. I think it's fair to be deeply suspicious of the motives of any man who thinks this is a good idea.
They’re not being singled out - they're being asked to follow the same rules and conventions as everybody else. If you're a biological male, you have no business in places designated specifically for women.So you're in favour of singling out a whole sub-section of society because one or two pervs use it as an opportunity to be pervs?
How about we do away with nightclubs because a few pervs inject young girls or spike their drinks? How about we ban men from coaching amateur athletics, swimming etc because a few of them are pervs? Etc, etc...
And this, ladies and gentlemen is how the Wokeraty work. Gaslighting and jumping from one extreme to the other. Talking of banning this and banning that.So you're in favour of singling out a whole sub-section of society because one or two pervs use it as an opportunity to be pervs?
How about we do away with nightclubs because a few pervs inject young girls or spike their drinks? How about we ban men from coaching amateur athletics, swimming etc because a few of them are pervs? Etc, etc...
So you're in favour of singling out a whole sub-section of society because one or two pervs use it as an opportunity to be pervs?
How about we do away with nightclubs because a few pervs inject young girls or spike their drinks? How about we ban men from coaching amateur athletics, swimming etc because a few of them are pervs? Etc, etc...
"sub-culture". go on just fuck of you weird cunt. "sub-culture" my arse. Mentally challenged like you ya cunt.So you're in favour of singling out a whole sub-section of society because one or two pervs use it as an opportunity to be pervs?
How about we do away with nightclubs because a few pervs inject young girls or spike their drinks? How about we ban men from coaching amateur athletics, swimming etc because a few of them are pervs? Etc, etc...
In a cubicle, like in shared changing areas in swimming pools and shops you mean?But all that is different from allowing male strangers to take their clothes of, in a cubicle next to a young girl.
No, it's related to pervs, always men, being pervs. If they're finding opportunities to be pervs and exploiting them then ban the opportunity, that's what you're saying about toilets.Your point about nightclubs isn't really related to the shared spaces problem.
How well has that worked?Just put safeguarding in place to prevent pervs where possible like they have when blokes are coaching amateur sports or cctv in nightclubs and awareness campaigns.
That bloke with a bit of lippy on has probably been told to live as a female for several years before undergoing surgery. They don't prescribe puberty blockers and book them in for an op the first time they see the Dr about it, as implied on an earlier post.You know, safeguarding to make blokes with a bit of lippy on and a dress go take a shit in the toilets that were designed for them.
Gaslighting or having an opinion and a conversation, something you struggle with, without resorting to insults. I'm not the one who started on about banning people from places.Gaslighting and jumping from one extreme to the other. Talking of banning this and banning that.
Ahh, nice to see you've joined in with your usual intelligent, insightful take on something."sub-culture". go on just fuck of you weird cunt. "sub-culture" my arse. Mentally challenged like you ya cunt.
But he can never live ‘as a female’ because he’s male. He can wear whatever he wants and call himself whatever he wants. And good luck to him - there’s nothing wrong with defying outmoded stereotypes. But he will never be a female, so by definition there is no way he can ever ‘live’ as a female.In a cubicle, like in shared changing areas in swimming pools and shops you mean?
No, it's related to pervs, always men, being pervs. If they're finding opportunities to be pervs and exploiting them then ban the opportunity, that's what you're saying about toilets.
How well has that worked?
That bloke with a bit of lippy on has probably been told to live as a female for several years before undergoing surgery. They don't prescribe puberty blockers and book them in for an op the first time they see the Dr about it, as implied on an earlier post.
Gaslighting or having an opinion and a conversation, something you struggle with, without resorting to insults. I'm not the one who started on about banning people from places.