Albrighton offski?

Sharky to the Baggies is nice fit for him too.

His part of the world, a step down but not too much.

Boing, boing Marc
 
I'm not convinced this is a good move by the club. Albrighton has, to the best of my knowledge, always been a consummate professional behind the scenes and a thoroughly positive influence not the least on the younger players.

I'm obviously not privy to the exact details why this has happened, where the initiative for the loan move has come from and what has been said by who but I feel it might be a mistake letting such a reliable player and influence go.
 
I'm not convinced this is a good move by the club. Albrighton has, to the best of my knowledge, always been a consummate professional behind the scenes and a thoroughly positive influence not the least on the younger players.

I'm obviously not privy to the exact details why this has happened, where the initiative for the loan move has come from and what has been said by who but I feel it might be a mistake letting such a reliable player and influence go.
He asked for it and the club sanctioned it due to his service
 
I also suspect it's wage bill related. By hook or crook the club would need to free up space on the wage bill (and the 25 man squad) for the 3 new players. So any offers for squad players would have been considered.

Just unfortunate that the only two we got out the door were both from same position.
 
I also suspect it's wage bill related. By hook or crook the club would need to free up space on the wage bill (and the 25 man squad) for the 3 new players. So any offers for squad players would have been considered.

Just unfortunate that the only two we got out the door were both from same position.
With Maddison and Ricardo fit as well as Tete and Praet, Perez and Albrighton would be be 5th and 6th choice.
 
I always think it feels a bit odd when clubs extend veteran players' contracts because they play a valuable back-up role and are an excellent role model around the place, only to then loan them out for 5 months.
 
The difference is that Albrighton wanted to go, because he wants to play. Vestergaard apparently could care less.
i know there's a difference, and that reflects on our twat of a manager. Not blaming the player at all.
albrighton is not stellar but he's consistent, compared to Perez he's fackin world class in effort and temperament.
 
To get away from a screaming baby and a hormonal wife.........i bloody would! 😎
i would like to add, after living on 4 hours sleep a night with a 4 hour daily commute to/from work where i have no idea how i didn't die in a fiery car crash after our first was born, i made damn sure for the second i stayed well away. slept in a different room and fucked off to work out the back door at 5:30am every day to avoid any baby stuff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vestegaard has been poor, but in this instance, his missus is about to give birth.

In your jobs, how many of you would disappear for 24 hours to look at a job and then go on secondment to a different country for 4 months?
If we were as bad at our jobs as he is at his we’d have been fucked off a year ago
 
Albrighton was probably told he could go when we thought we were getting Harrison. And either Albrighton had already signed when Leeds pulled the plug, or we didn’t have the heart to scupper it for him.
 
That, and maybe, he thought he could help by taking a little bit off the wage bill at the same time. I'd like to think its the kind of thing he'd do.
Bet we'll never know how little of his wages are being paid by the baggies.
 
Albrighton was probably told he could go when we thought we were getting Harrison. And either Albrighton had already signed when Leeds pulled the plug, or we didn’t have the heart to scupper it for him.
He said something about his kids going to watch him play every week so he wanted to actually play more often, rather than getting splinters in his arse.
 
Like I just said on another thread, Leeds blocked the Harrison move at the 11th hour as they couldn’t get a replacement signed. We just let Albrighton go no questions asked.

It’s comedy gold really.
 
Like I just said on another thread, Leeds blocked the Harrison move at the 11th hour as they couldn’t get a replacement signed. We just let Albrighton go no questions asked.

It’s comedy gold really.
I’m all for treating our legends with respect, but I think allowing Schmeichel to leave without a replacement has backfired. Let’s hope the same doesn’t happen with Albrighton.
 
They must be close to the limit as regards wages and FFP, plus keeping the squad to 25.

We were talking about this on Tuesday. Schmeichel was our joint highest earner and we haven’t replaced him. Vardy signed an extended contract and surely what we pay him will slowly run down season by season. That should give us a big chunk of additional wages to use elsewhere.
 
I'm not sure that Schmeichel would currently be that much better than Ward.
Everybody had a downer on Perez and Albrighton was hardly ripping up trees in the PL. We've replaced two underperforming wide players with a proper left footed right winger. We still have Praet that can slot in there or Maddison.
It's not ideal but I think we now have a stronger first eleven and we've massively reduced the salary bill.
Allbrighton was pushing to leave so should we have kept Perez hanging around in the hope that Harrison did sign? Just unfortunate that didn't come off but if it had wpuld Perez/Albrighton have made the squad of 25?
 
They must be close to the limit as regards wages and FFP, plus keeping the squad to 25.
At the start of the season they spoke of needing to balance the books with transfers, if true then from an FFP perspective I think they were still some way off the limit because of the Fofana deal (even taking into account the sell on fee) and another deal would have been possible.
 
Widely reported by reasonable sources on Twitter
It sounds indeed like the initative was coming from Albrighton himself. I hadn't seen that before.

"It was on and off and on and off," [Albrighton] said. "It was only a few days before the window closed that I heard of the interest from Albion and I'd already had the conversation with the manager at Leicester at the start of the month when the window opened.

"I was probably in a comfort zone at Leicester. Having so many friends there it can feel quite comfortable, but I knew I needed a new challenge.

"I told him I wanted more first-team football between now and the end of season. He fully understood and has helped this deal come about."
As others have stated already, I suppose it is understandable from his point of view but I still feel it might turn out a mistake to let such an experienced and dependable player go while others prefer to get splinters into their backside.

I'm sure he'll do well for them. Given his family situation and background, West Brom might be a good fit for him that's coming at the right time. He's still contracted to Leicester until 2024 though so we might see him again.
 
The 25 man squad has been announced. With Albrighton and Perez going its freed up space for Souttar and Teté. JJ drops out and Ricky comes back in. That’s it. This means that Vestergaard is still in the 25 and even more bizarrely so is Bertrand. ( Kristiansen is U21 so doesn’t count).
 
I have just listened to his interview with WBA, sounds as if he couldn't wait to get out of here and talks of Leicester in past tense ? Unfortunately I don't think we will see him in a city shirt again.
 
Wage bill reduced to 85% from >110% of turnover, apparently...

Took a look at this as the figure that is always quoted as being over 100% always seems a bit bogus because it related to the 2019/2020 season (1st COVID season) when whilst some player bonuses were deferred to the following season so was a substantial chunk of revenue. Looks like it is based on someone's analysis of the Deloitte Football Money League (though it quotes 105% for the season in question). The latest of which shows the following for us:

Deloitte.PNG

Also, note that the basis of the Wage to Turnover %age appears to be the same as in the accounts ("Wage costs includes wages, salaries, signing-on fees, bonuses, termination payments, social security contributions and other employee benefit expenses for all employees (including players, technical and administrative employees)"). Should we ever qualify to compete in Europe again this is different to what is included in UEFA's new short term cost control calculation.
 
Back
Top