Running Fox
Roofer
The fraud is real, youtube has banned all evidence being shown now, but it is blatant.
Last edited:
Give it 11 minutes it might be back up.The fraud is real, youtube as banned all evidence being shown now, but it is blatant.
I think you should have been on the phone to Trump's lawyers, as they couldn't seem to find any to show the courts in the 59 cases they went to. I think you should go to the press about it and show what you've uncovered. It could be bigger than Watergate.You've not looked where you should then, as i've seen so much evidence it can't be ignored and to say you've seen none is either a lie or you haven't looked. By repeating the same lie over and over doesn't ever make it the truth. Done !
My understanding is that there is substantial allegations of fraud backed up by hundreds (if not thousands) of sworn affidavits and video and physical evidence.A few on here keep mentioning massive voter fraud.
they mean of course claims of fraud, so far completely un substantiated.
maybe their claims will eventually backed up with some actual proof.
Bill Barr the outgoing AG said in public that no widespread fraud took place in the election.
The only people claiming fraud are Trump and Powell and their lackies.
In court 59 cases have been dismissed including 2 cases at the supreme court, theirs none so blind eh
all your doing here is highlighting how one sided your point of view is, there are of course pictures of GOP members taken with CCP members, but that doesn't fit the narrative that you are parroting.View attachment 555
They've sold their country to the Communists for their own personal greed. It started a long time ago with Bush, Clinton, Barry etc, this is the last pieces of the jigsaw fitting into place.
Can you point us in the direction of actual proof of these 'substantial allegations'?My understanding is that there is substantial allegations of fraud backed up by hundreds (if not thousands) of sworn affidavits and video and physical evidence.
It is also my understanding that there has been little or no investigation of the 'evidence' by law enforcement and state officials in the courts or elsewhere. Most cases are simply dismissed, often because there is no corroborating evidence, which of course is quite true as no one has looked for it. The MSM barely reports this.
The Supreme Court has not looked at the evidence either, the dismissals were on procedural grounds.
Have you actually read any of these affidavits?My understanding is that there is substantial allegations of fraud backed up by hundreds (if not thousands) of sworn affidavits and video and physical evidence.
It is also my understanding that there has been little or no investigation of the 'evidence' by law enforcement and state officials in the courts or elsewhere. Most cases are simply dismissed, often because there is no corroborating evidence, which of course is quite true as no one has looked for it. The MSM barely reports this.
The Supreme Court has not looked at the evidence either, the dismissals were on procedural grounds.
You've not looked where you should then, as i've seen so much evidence it can't be ignored and to say you've seen none is either a lie or you haven't looked. By repeating the same lie over and over doesn't ever make it the truth. Done !
The fraud is real, youtube has banned all evidence being shown now, but it is blatant.
No sixthswan, that is simply not true.It is sad to see really.
The MSM does dictate a narrative. That will always be the case, because there are human beings doing the work. They are fed stories by other human beings. There is going to be some bias creep in. In some newspapers, the owner is already completely biased and will side the stories to their will.
But there seems to be a growing group of people that distrust the MSM; but completely trust non-mainstream news outlets and individuals.
Even with outlandish claims and stories.
I'm sure this information source attracts people who also believe in (not all of these sort of things) the occult, mysticism, alternative histories, conspiracies on a grand scale etc.
Certainty in either MSM, or Alternative Media stories; is a sad situation.
Or perhaps watching some of the court procedures as I have done.Have you actually read any of these affidavits?
you know that you can, i have read some of them.
many of them were presented in court, before being dismissed.
i would recommend actually reading what happened in court rather than rely on second hand reports in the media.
In which case, you must know that no credible evidence was presentedOr perhaps watching some of the court procedures as I have done.
I'm confused.No credible evidence was allowed to be presented.
For the simple reason that none of the allegations were investigated by law inforcement or local justice departments.
For the simple reason that none of the allegations were investigated by law inforcement or local justice departments.
No sixthswan, that is simply not true.
People like me, and there are a fair few of us, distrust all media outlets, that is true. Just because they are mainstream does not make them any more or less trustworthy than alternative sites.
I accept, and have done for many years, that privately owned newspapers have a bias, this is self evident. The owners have an agenda which I ignore by not buying their product, that is my choice.
Where I have an issue is (mostly) broadcast organisations present themselves as neutral news outlets when they are no such thing. Sadly some people, some quite intelligent people at that, are unable to see, what to some of us is quite obvious.
The constant peddling of left wing, pro eu, anti Trump propaganda has undoubtably worked on many people though for me the opposite is true, their obvious lies and predominantly (social) marxist rhetoric has lead me to distrust pretty much everything from outlets such as CNN, BBC and the rest of uk broadcast news.
Agree entirely sixthswan, most of what we, as ordinary folk, are being told is 'utter bollocks'.I distrust both the MSM and alternative news sources. Think for yourself, but think clearly.
Perhaps I am wrong, but you strike me as believing in too much of the non-mainstream stuff.
Most of it is complete and utter bollocks.
You think China haven’t ‘acknowledged the result’ ?Biden won means Bidenwon get used to it as Brexiteers say.
Trump is a would dictator like his mate Putin you could see that when he started putting his family in high positions why do think Russia and China won't acknowledge the result?