I thought they didn't want LGBT Paedo lite to be shoved down their children's throats before the age of 18.I see the laughing imbecile finds it funny that a 21st century European government that passes laws against homosexuality is seen as hateful . I guess we all knew that imbeciles still think like that though .
AFC should know better .
I see the laughing imbecile finds it funny that a 21st century European government that passes laws against homosexuality is seen as hateful . I guess we all knew that imbeciles still think like that though .
AFC should know better .
Difficult to know as I do not know the situation in Hungary. Just that it should not be the schools remit to promote homosexuality, age appropriate sex education is fine but it should be factual and not agenda driven.
That said I did clearly say that adult sexuality is up to the individual. Personally I believe the promotion of the Trans and LBGT+ agenda in English schools is causing untold harm.
Difficult to know as I do not know the situation in Hungary. Just that it should not be the schools remit to promote homosexuality, age appropriate sex education is fine but it should be factual and not agenda driven.
That said I did clearly say that adult sexuality is up to the individual. Personally I believe the promotion of the Trans and LBGT+ agenda in English schools is causing untold harm.
AFC
Even if this were true which it isn’t what harm would be done ?
If you mean children are taught facts . I.e . Gay and Trans people exist . Why is that causing “ untold harm ?”
Given the misery most gay teenagers probably endured in the 70s when I was at school , I suspect a more tolerant and open attitude has had exactly the opposite effect .
Why are so many older folks so terrified of other peoples sexuality ? It’s Very odd
Activist driven agendas.Protected from what exactly?
If protected from sex, well - it’s all a bit snow flakey, but ok…implement a blanket ban on all sexual content.
Otherwise just seems like rabble rousing…you know…demonise the “others”.
old men and their insecurities…
Activist driven agendas.
And who is talking about a blanket ban? Not me.
That said, children do not have critical abilities, some things are best left until they do.
And stop with the homophobic slurs, pretty poor show.
Actually, in a sense, I am suggesting a blanket ban until children are old enough to handle such information in a critical way. I am a great believer in letting 'children be children', not trying to hide anything but trying to keep things simple, emphasise the importance of the family (whatever the makeup) without taking sides, leave those decisions a little later.I'm not sure that reply was supposed to be directed to me, but if it was I didn't understand any of it.
I know you didn't suggest a blanket ban. I wondered why, if you felt children should be left alone until they are mature enough, you haven't proposed a blanket ban? Surely we should protect them from homo, hetero, bi, pan and all other sexual persuasions that night be too much for them to handle? Yet it's only the homo element that has caused the upset....
And if there was a homophobic slur in my post them it's one I'm unaware of. It's possible, Im a bit out of date on what is considered offensive,
Aggressive agenda? Let's bring back Section 28. We can't have our children being taught to be gay can we now?slavishly following an aggressive agenda to children is not.
I think the truth is somewhere in the middle of those views.Aggressive agenda? Let's bring back Section 28. We can't have our children being taught to be gay can we now?
Let's carry on teaching them to be straight as none of them turn out gay then.
As usual I find that having views that do not fit with the current SJW agenda does tend to upset some people. Good.I think the truth is somewhere in the middle of those views.
Why is it considered extreme to want children to be taught the reality of what happens in real life? And I don't mean the gory details of everything, just about different relationships.And there lies the problem, each side goes to the extreme view, the right thing is somewhere in the middle.
Actually Adumass, I think that 11 is about the right age to start this, cognitive abilities are being formed in the child and decent teachers can do a great job here, and I am sure many do. Clearly in this instance the system is working correctly which is great, if there is no 'promotion' of a particular lifestyle then it renders any laws against such promotion pointless in this case.i have recent (i.e. last month) experience of this. my lad, 11 yrs old, has just had this part of the PSHE curriculum taught, and absolutely NONE of it could be described as part of an "aggressive agenda", or even any agenda. ffs.
you'd think they were being tied to a chair (oooh) and forcibly taught that gay is the way whilst rainbows were projected around the classroom and judy garland played through the tannoy. you really should do some research into the curriculum (you can start here), and the teaching guides, to get a better understanding.
some of this shyte sounds identical to arguments made by the placard waving lunatics outside that brummie school the other year. different reaction on there then, though.
i do love the imagery you paint though: this lone wolf, fighting the injustices of the world: the SJWs, the woke, like you're russell crowe in gladiator, burning your way through socialist society.