It should be the most studied archetectural failure in history

I bet l can list the people on here who think Bin Laden and a group of Stanley knife wielding rag heads did it !

Hackney
Daz
Clutch Book
Glimmer
here we are
...
 
Last edited:
Two possibilities.

1. The Yanks set the whole thing up.
Fired things made to look like planes, or controlled planes, at a series of buildings.
Those buildings either naturally collapsed, or were subject to controlled demolition. Irrelevant.
Evidence of terrorism planted at the scene.
Those in the know made a ton of cash.

2. The Yanks allowed the attack to happen.
Someone else fired things made to look like planes, or controlled planes, at a series of buildings.
Those buildings either naturally collapsed, or were subject to controlled demolition. Irrelevant.
Evidence of terrorism planted at the scene.
Those in the know made a ton of cash.

There is no way Bid Laden and some blokes did the whole thing undetected.
Regardless of the scenario - the whole thing was a pretext to make a fortune for the MIC.
 
sixthswan said:
Two possibilities.

1. The Yanks set the whole thing up.
Fired things made to look like planes, or controlled planes, at a series of buildings.
Those buildings either naturally collapsed, or were subject to controlled demolition. Irrelevant.
Evidence of terrorism planted at the scene.
Those in the know made a ton of cash.

2. The Yanks allowed the attack to happen.
Someone else fired things made to look like planes, or controlled planes, at a series of buildings.
Those buildings either naturally collapsed, or were subject to controlled demolition. Irrelevant.
Evidence of terrorism planted at the scene.
Those in the know made a ton of cash.

There is no way Bid Laden and some blokes did the whole thing undetected.
Regardless of the scenario - the whole thing was a pretext to make a fortune for the MIC.
Click to expand...
3. It was a terrorist attack as per the official narrative.

Which one is the most likely.
 
sixthswan said:
2 - the new Pearl Harbour
Click to expand...
What the PNAC pushed for.
BUT… are they really that evil to allow thousands of “their own” to perish and millions of others?
Maybe that’s how they want us to think. Think like us and not like them.
You have to be some proper evil mother fucker to be one of them if it is the case.
 
As if they would care about a few office workers...

For those that really run the United States, the land they occupy is merely a temporary nest.
 
What about the people who lost their lives on the planes and were forced to call their loved ones to say goodbye
 
Richardvanles said:
What the PNAC pushed for.
BUT… are they really that evil to allow thousands of “their own” to perish and millions of others?
Maybe that’s how they want us to think. Think like us and not like them.
You have to be some proper evil mother fucker to be one of them if it is the case.
Click to expand...
it was a CIA op, the CIA are the Deep States private police.

Just revers engineer it, and it will show itself.
 
Daz40 said:
What about the people who lost their lives on the planes and were forced to call their loved ones to say goodbye
Click to expand...

In my scenarios, controlled planes can either be empty or occupied planes - remote or terrorist controlled.
DNA has been found of some of the passengers and crew.
One person was identified by a tooth found in a tree.

But the finding of a hijacker's passport makes everything seem very suspicious. From a plane which was mostly pulverised.
Still struggling to understand as well, how the greatest military force on earth, could not deal with obviously hijacked planes heading into New York and Washington...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top