Homes does the Cahill video not help with the question "who gains" ?You and others can access lots of material which takes a particular point of view. I'm simply questioning the motivation of the original source and positing that perhaps you're being played by (another) Man
They are not helping, theres no good reason for wearing them if you are talking about health. Its also oppressive to demand (or trick in this case) that we do something without a bullet proof reason. The "demand" is nothing more than an offer disguised as an order.On a message board set up to air conspiracy theories I'm theorising that there is a conspiracy to promote anti-mask wearing.
At over an hour my attention span isn't that good. I'm guessing she's doing OK out of it though.Homes does the Cahill video not help with the question "who gains" ?
I question everything Homes. I have no pre-concieved agenda. Dolores Cahill is as clean as a whistle so her words should be taken note of, thats why l posted it. I have found that once you unearth a lie, all the rest follow quickly and the truth starts to appear.You and others can access lots of material which takes a particular point of view. I'm simply questioning the motivation of the original source and positing that perhaps you're being played by (another) Man
There are definitely pros and cons. My view is that at a population level they are good for public health. Individuals should have the freedom to not wear one if it harms them and that right should be respected. However, a crude analogy would be with free speech and the right to shout "fire" in a crowded cinema - they don't have the right opt out if that choice on balance causes more harm to others.They are not helping, theres no good reason for wearing them if you are talking about health. Its also oppressive to demand (or trick in this case) that we do something without a bullet proof reason. The "demand" is nothing more than an offer disguised as an order.
Odd thing to say ! do you believe that theres anyone in world who want to do good and its not all about money for some. Shes actually well paid, shes wrote novels, shes a doctor and a MEP. I could live quite well on that money.At over an hour my attention span isn't that good. I'm guessing she's doing OK out of it though.
I refer you to my previous message about my theoryOdd thing to say ! do you believe that theres anyone in world who want to do good and its not all about money for some. Shes actually well paid, shes wrote novels, shes a doctor and a MEP. I could live quite well on that money.
Shouting fire in a theatre is allowed, when theres a fire !There are definitely pros and cons. My view is that at a population level they are good for public health. Individuals should have the freedom to not wear one if it harms them and that right should be respected. However, a crude analogy would be with free speech and the right to shout "fire" in a crowded cinema - they don't have the right opt out if that choice on balance causes more harm to others.
ok cr,healthy as one of don's burgers after closing time.....Ayup Mali,how's it going?