We would have stayed up with almost anyone in charge other than that charlatan.Enzo was at Citeh, but had made it clear that he wanted to manage. If Top had done the right thing, and binned TCR six months earlier, and signed him at that time, would we have stayed up?
This is almost certainly true. Those two games with Sadler and Stowell cost us massively.Dean Smith would have kept us up if he'd come in straight after the Palace game.
If we go up some people will no doubt be saying our relegation was a 'blessing in disguise', but it didn't feel that way on the last day of last season. And it definitely wouldn't feel that way if we were in Southampton's position right now.They reckon it’s about a £100m loss for relegation. I think I’d rather stayed up and tried to implement the new system this season with possibly better players. Relegation is a huge risk. It looks like we’ll bounce back straight away but if we don’t it may ruin us for years.
I might have agreed with that if the next game had been the following weekend but with the midweek game I think that needs to be corrected to "before" the Palace game as I don't think 3 games in a week gives a new manager any time to prepare a team, only to give different words of encouragement. The other fly in the ointment of that theory is Fulham away. He'd had plenty of time by that point to see what was needed and, well...! Of course had he managed to get something more from Villa & Bournemouth it might have made that moot but I remain convinced that regardless of how many of us feel he should have gone a lot earlier, the International break after Brentford was the latest it should have been done.Dean Smith would have kept us up if he'd come in straight after the Palace game.
I view it much like a game of Snakes & Ladders. Last season was a snake but without relegation it could have been a short snake, relegation is undoubtedly a significantly longer snake (how long will depend on how long it takes us to get up) and on a part of the board where ladders are short so we are going to be dependent on throwing a shit load of 6's (getting Enzo looks to be the first of them) to get back to where we should/could have been.It looks like we’ll bounce back straight away but if we don’t it may ruin us for years.
You’ll remember Buz we spoke about it leaving Palace. Had Brentford been a shit show he may have gone. But it was an alright performance, unfortunately enough to keep him in his job.I might have agreed with that if the next game had been the following weekend but with the midweek game I think that needs to be corrected to "before" the Palace game as I don't think 3 games in a week gives a new manager any time to prepare a team, only to give different words of encouragement. The other fly in the ointment of that theory is Fulham away. He'd had plenty of time by that point to see what was needed and, well...! Of course had he managed to get something more from Villa & Bournemouth it might have made that moot but I remain convinced that regardless of how many of us feel he should have gone a lot earlier, the International break after Brentford was the latest it should have been done.
I think it was more than that one moment.We would have stayed up if someone had stopped Maddison taking that penalty
Fester was and is a div2 player. Nothing has changed.Heres another one. Ezo has actually turned Jarl Jannik of Vestergaardinto a footballer. Whatcould he have made Caglar Soyuncu?
Compounded with Forest winning and Brighton rolling over for Everton on the same day. The acca won me over £200Fulham with Soumare was where we should have done enough to stay up, it was one of the most disgraceful efforts ever.
Possibly. Possibly not.We would have stayed up if someone had stopped Maddison taking that penalty