jackieguaccamo
Flat Earther
Tony Blair the man who refused to say whether his son had the MMR jab, because it was a private family matter now wants to force vaccination on the population. And people fucking listen to this evil satanic monster.
Spoke perfect sense to me .Tony Blair the man who refused to say whether his son had the MMR jab, because it was a private family matter now wants to force vaccination on the population. And people fucking listen to this evil satanic monster.
My thoughts exactly, just need horns and he looks what he is.I can’t even watch the murdering cunt. Evil personified. Only reason he turned to Catholicism is because they believe if you confess your sins before you die you’re exonerated from them.
Hedging his bets.
It is coercion, plain and simple.Spoke perfect sense to me .
Incidentally in the Marr interview I saw , he didn’t advocate forcing the vaccination on any one . But once again - Facts aren’t your speciality are they ?
His actual stance was that it is inevitable that in some spheres for the forseeable future ( i.e. Foreign travel , large events like sport and festivals, proof of vaccination will inevitably be required .
If you choose not to have it thats your responsibility.
Can’t see the problem ?
Who has coerced you ?It is coercion, plain and simple.
By any rational analysis it is a contravention of the Nuremberg Code.
Interesting to hear the NHS website has crashed today due to all those 25 -30 year olds being coerced to be vaccinatedWho has coerced you ?
Apologies if that’s not the case . It’s what I heard on 11 o clock news on LBC .That wasn't the reason.
No one yet, but if I want a holiday, or to go to the football...Who has coerced you ?
It boils down to your personal choice then ?No one yet, but if I want a holiday, or to go to the football...
I'm retired so at least I do not have to 'get the jab to get a job'.
My choice is to not have the jab and live my life. It boils down to coercion.It boils down to your personal choice then ?
Apologies if that’s not the case . It’s what I heard on 11 o clock news on LBC .
My choice is to not have the jab and live my life. It boils down to coercion.
Sadly all the data points to your life being very much more at risk if you remain unvaccinated . Hence the understandably cautious approach to allowing full returns to our freedomsMy choice is to not have the jab and live my life. It boils down to coercion.
And you think that’s acceptable? (Not accusing you btw)But in the end, you can still live your life - but with a few restrictions.
If any of this nonsense even comes to pass.
The real answers to your questions looking at the data availableAnd you think that’s acceptable? (Not accusing you btw)
Constantly those opposed to being treated like a lab rat are asked to justify themselves which jabbers blindly get jabbed. No one can actually explain to me any logical reason to endanger my life getting a vaccine that is still in its test stage and what benefits I MAY gain from it. They just dribble shit MSM have told them without putting any thought process into it.
Q.Can I still get covid after getting the vaccine?
A. Yes.
Q. Can I still pass covid on to others after getting the vaccine?
A. Yes.
Q. Can the vaccine kill me or give me a life changing disability?
A. Yes probably.
Q. By not taking the vaccine will it improve my chances of survival if I get covid.
A. Yes probably.
Ok, I’d prefer to take my chances without the vaccine. Its clear my choice won’t effect others but the weasels insist it will without any solid argument.
Am I missing something? I’m genuinely at a loss to understand what their issue is.
Some use the “protect the NHS” line but that’s got more holes in than Compos underpants.
1. Possibly, but Ivermectin and HCQ+ are at least as effective and have no serious side effects either in the short or ling term.The real answers to your questions looking at the data available
1. Yes but Reduces your chances of serious illness or death by 90 % or more
2. Yes but reduces transmission rate by 60% or more
3. No conclusive evidence of vaccines directly responsible for deaths, though available data suggests .0007% chance of developing dangerous blood clots if vaccinated as opposed to 7% if infected with Covid 19
4. Utter rubbish .
Glad to supply the facts as currently available .
But there is also a chance others will suffer if I have the trial vaccine and need hospital care. There is an argument that by taking a vaccine that clinical trials haven’t finished then I have put myself in danger through my own stupidity and therefore shouldn’t receive hospital treatment.I don't think the vaccine will protect you. It is certain that you will die.
Nobody is saying that you should take it. Well not me anyway.
If there is a chance that you could suffer more with Covid, without it - then it is your personal choice to avoid that alleged protection.
But if you accept that others may suffer as a result of you needing hospital care, then there is an alternative argument - which brings your personal choice into question.
Also there is mounting evidence (I don't know for sure), that vaccines can make the virus less transmissible. Not untransmissible, but less so. Which would gives some credence to restricting some activities of those who have refused the vaccines. Not those who can't take them of course. Because you are refusing to protect others.
Tough thing morally though...
The big lie is that transmission is possible asymptomatically, there is no evidence of this at all.I don't think the vaccine will protect you. It is certain that you will die.
Nobody is saying that you should take it. Well not me anyway.
If there is a chance that you could suffer more with Covid, without it - then it is your personal choice to avoid that alleged protection.
But if you accept that others may suffer as a result of you needing hospital care, then there is an alternative argument - which brings your personal choice into question.
Also there is mounting evidence (I don't know for sure), that vaccines can make the virus less transmissible. Not untransmissible, but less so. Which would gives some credence to restricting some activities of those who have refused the vaccines. Not those who can't take them of course. Because you are refusing to protect others.
Tough thing morally though...
Very much so.Are you really questioning the possibility of asymptomatic transmission?
You and campsThe big lie is that transmission is possible asymptomatically, there is no evidence of this at all.
This gives the medical authorities the ultimate sanction to lock up and discriminate against the un-vaxxed 'for the safety of others'. Once people accept that, and many already have, sanctions against the un-vaxxed are on the way.
If you break the sanctions you will, inevitably be 'detained'. It always ends with camps.
No, why is that relevant?So do you think symptoms happen immediately?
Well you’re very much wrong I’m afraid as all the published, peer reviewed and properly sourced science makes clearVery much so.
No, why is that relevant?