The myth about graphene oxide in vaccines seems to have originated with a Spanish study claiming that, using
transmission electron microscopy (a microscopy technique which allows particularly fine details and structures to be seen), a solution created from a vial of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine takes a similar form to graphene oxide.
However there are
many issues with this research, which has not been published in a scientific journal or peer reviewed.
Firstly, the provenance of the vial is unknown. We don’t know whether it was a vial of the vaccine, and fact checkers
Health Feedback report that the person who sent the vial to the researcher is known to spread anti-vaccine content.
Secondly, the study says the findings are not “conclusive evidence” for the presence of graphene oxide in the vaccine.
While the researcher is a professor at the University of Almeria, the university has distanced itself from the work, saying it is “unofficial report by a university professor about an analysis of a sample of unknown origin with total lack of traceability”.
It would appear that that you are blinkered so much that you do not seem to be able to consider science, or simple maths and prefer to be only informed by amateur quacks and conspiracy theorists from the uneducated corners of the web. Your choice. Time will tell who is right.
But you can't deny simple science and maths, so there is no question to argue about the two points I am saying you are wrong on.
You'll note that I haven't participated in your Russiagate thread as I don't have the knowledge, experience or in fact interest to make any valid comment.
Also, a bit confused by the importance of the Tavistock Institute. They seem to be accepting Coronovirus as a fact of life to be dealt with - Nothing controversial to be seen unless you have got a specific item you wish us to refer to. Please enlighten us.
Here at the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, we have adapted to work alongside the pandemic as opposed to against it.
www.tavinstitute.org