no it hasn't.No he didn't, tht's been covered many times on here.
Oh yes it as !!!!Oh yes it has!!!
Try and do some research outside of bitchute and find anything that supports your claim. Needs to be something you can actually back up, not a 'I'm putting this on here for discussion, I don't know whether it's true'.
The other thing that's been covered a number of times is why matches are now stopped if someone in the crowd has a seizure etc.
It's in the rules.
You have a point, we should not judge . Its not like he has form?I’m no fan of Boris, but benefit of the doubt and all that. He might not have realised it was a “party”
Are you fucking nuts ? don't answer that !None of the above rant excuses the lie you posted about Starmer.
You had 40 minutes of research time, clearly couldn’t back up your ridiculous claim so just ranted instead.
In 40 minutes can you back up your claim about Sadiq Khan? How can you possible know what those in City Hall think of him yet here you are claiming you have more knowledge than MPs who have dealings with him. London voters clearly thought he was a better than the other options or did Sean Bailey get 80% of the vote.
Starmer campaigned for years and finally succeeded in making it easier to bring sex abuse to prosecutionI know someone who works closely with him, thinks highly of him.
BBC DJ demands Keir Starmer apologise for role in sex abuse scandal
Sir Keir Starmer should apologise for his role in the scandal of men falsely accused of sexually abusing children, Paul Gambaccini (pictured right with Cliff Richard and Jimmy Tarbuck) said.www.google.com
I’m an apologist for paedophilia?
Really?
Fuck me, now he's quoting Paul Paedo Gambaccini as some sort of moral measure. Who's next Jonathan King, Gary Glitter or Cliff Richard?I know someone who works closely with him, thinks highly of him.
BBC DJ demands Keir Starmer apologise for role in sex abuse scandal
Sir Keir Starmer should apologise for his role in the scandal of men falsely accused of sexually abusing children, Paul Gambaccini (pictured right with Cliff Richard and Jimmy Tarbuck) said.www.google.com
I’m an apologist for paedophilia?
Really?
No-one needs to read any further.I've not checked
maybeI know someone who works closely with him, thinks highly of him.
BBC DJ demands Keir Starmer apologise for role in sex abuse scandal
Sir Keir Starmer should apologise for his role in the scandal of men falsely accused of sexually abusing children, Paul Gambaccini (pictured right with Cliff Richard and Jimmy Tarbuck) said.www.google.com
I’m an apologist for paedophilia?
Really?
When He starts quoting a well known paedophile as some sort of defence to his argument, you know he's full of shit.maybe
you don't seem to have any thought for anything except your politically daft ideas, kids, rape, murders, appear unimportant to you pushing the thoughts of Chairman Mao.
You just don't care about anyone else, its something that seems to run through your horrible bull shit and constant lies. You really come across sounding very much like a sociopath, at least.
Have you looked at the article?When He starts quoting a well known paedophile as some sort of defence to his argument, you know he's full of shit.
Starmer was on the cover up of the pakistani peado gangsHave you looked at the article?
Gambocini is anti starmer, which doesn't put him on Hackney's side of the argument...
Yes, yes I read the article thanks. And I said, to quote a fucking nonce protecting his nonce mates is bullshit. Especially when none of them got done for their decades of perverted sexual abuse of young children. When it is well known within the industry and higher up exactly what they have been up to for decades. Dolphin Square anyone, here Kitty Kitty.Have you looked at the article?
Gambocini is anti starmer, which doesn't put him on Hackney's side of the argument...
No he didn't, tht's been covered many times on here
Just replying so that you can't edit your post later when you realise yoy've got your numbers mixed up, again.The time you lied to cover up the rape of 500 disabled children, is there no limit to your disgusting lies for a political view.
This lie is far worse than you lying about Russiagate. Yet you deny this, lower than low !!
No shame !
COVERED THIS DID WE ?
This is most likely the usual crap from fatboy and as he himself admits:The time you lied to cover up the rape of 500 disabled children, is there no limit to your disgusting lies for a political view.
This lie is far worse than you lying about Russiagate. Yet you deny this, lower than low !!
No shame !
COVERED THIS DID WE ?
HE WAS THE HEAD OF THE CPS THAT DIDN'T FIND ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CHARGE SAVILLE.The piece above doesn't actually claim that he raped 500 disabled children, you've done your research and gone off at a weird tangent again.
There were 500 known victims of Saville NOT 500 disabled children abused by him.
I certainly didn't lie to cover anything up, please stop throwing such stupid claims around.
I don't make exuses for paedophiles, I don't lie to cover them up.
If you're going to make either of these claims again then a cut and paste showing where I've done that would be helpful. It'll also keep you off here whilst you're trying to find anything to back up your despicable claims, we'll all be better off.
Again you're wrong about Starmer.
Who is Tony Marks? An investagative journalist of some repute like Paul Foot or more like Yaxley-Lennon?
The following links are somewhat more believable, although you'll claim that they're all controlled by Bill Gates.
Keir Starmer led the CPS when it did not charge Jimmy Savile, but he wasn’t the reviewing lawyer - Full Fact
Keir Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions when it was decided there was insufficient evidence to charge Savile, but he was not the reviewing lawyer on the case.fullfact.org
Fact Check-No evidence UK’s Keir Starmer was directly involved in failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile
Speculation circulating online in 2020 has resurfaced on social media claiming that UK Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer was responsible for failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, the late TV and radio presenter revealed after his death to be one of Britain’s most prolific...www.reuters.com
Logically Facts | A Global Initiative To Fight Online Mis/Disinformation
Logically Facts helps mitigate the risks posed by mis/disinformation to public health, public safety, election integrity, and national security by enabling platforms to operate in markets safely, responsibly and compliantly.www.logically.ai
Sir Keir Starmer and the Jimmy Savile scandal - what was Labour leader's role when he was head of Public Prosecutions?
LABOUR leader Sir Keir Starmer, a former Director of Public Prosecutions in England and Wales, oversaw high profile criminal cases. But what was the role that the former Crown Prosecution Service …www.thesun.co.uk
Please expand on your latest 'research', you uncovering that the government trying to stop the right to protest.
The same 'research' that the BBC, C4 News, The Guardian* and Foxgolfer have been discussing for months.
*Fairly sure that it was also covered by many other TV News programmes and Newspapers but I don't have the time to check them all.
No shame on your part, hysterical and unsubstantiated claims against anyone who disagrees with you.
Does the head of the CPS get that closely involved with the crimes that go to court?HE WAS THE HEAD OF THE CPS THAT DIDN'T FIND ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CHARGE SAVILLE.
Do you get that, he was in fucking charge !!!
Stop wriggling and lying, l doubt that is possible with you !
"Reuters" fact checkers - thats the most desperate post ever !
How about apologising about you Russiagate lies, not a mention of that eh, wonder why
course he fucking does hes in charge ffs !Does the head of the CPS get that closely involved with the crimes that go to court?
It matters because you accused me of lying to cover up the abuse of 500 disabled children.Hackney, answer this - why does it matter if the 500 kids mentioned were disabled or not ?
they are defenceless children can you not get that or as it appears do you not care about these poor children ?
and if Starmer had charged Saville how many would have been saved from abuse.
course he fucking does hes in charge ffs !
you really think the highest profile case was kept from him when he was in charge ?
are you nuts or just stupid ?
Both babes. Why would he cover it up? I bet he's a Paedo as well. He has got quite big ears.course he fucking does hes in charge ffs !
you really think the highest profile case was kept from him when he was in charge ?
are you nuts or just stupid ?