Freedom of information request

Two years of our lives wasted. People dying alone with no family members, funerals with under 30 people allowed, numerous suicides, job losses, divorces, mental health issues, no doctors appointments, important life changing treatments cancelled. And what for?

Some people need to hang for what they have done to us over the last two years. Fortunately my children and I didn't succumb to the jab threats, but I know lots of people that did. If I was them I'd want answers and I'd want them quickly.
 
Old news.

This has been well known to anyone not totally in thrall to the propaganda for a very long time, most 'covid deaths' are with covid, not of covid but until a few days ago this was still a 'conspiracy theory'.

(Note. In the US the CDC figures show that 94% of 'covid deaths' are people with 2 or more co-morbidities.)

This is the first of the big lies to begin to unravel, wonder which one will be next? Asymptomatic infection perhaps?
 
I hang the ones that went along with it too and promoted the evil bullshit on social media MSM and the press
Hang em high and leave the bastards for the birds as a reminder.
 
Richardvanles said:
I hang the ones that went along with it too and promoted the evil bullshit on social media MSM and the press
Hang em high and leave the bastards for the birds as a reminder.
Click to expand...
I called up the doctors this morning to see if they were still jabbing people as I've been reading the 111 telephone service are advising against the jabs now (don't know if this is true), sadly they are, and wanted to book me in tomorrow morning, I said I was working so couldn't, next clinic was Feb 19th.
 
He's one of those daytime doctors who has been condemning those of us that chose not to have the jab, spinning false numbers of unjabbed in intensive care etc. Now he's backtracking on all his fear mongering and bullshit.
 
Last edited:
Whoops. The BBC peddling misinformation? Who'da thunk it!

So Shillary is a bloke then? Who knew?

So maybe he has something to hang him by!
 
jackieguaccamo said:
Dr Shillary Jones has rapidly changed his tune over the last couple of days.
Click to expand...
hes still stringing it along, I've never trusted cross dressers to be honest..

A bit air dancing for him and hundreds of others who have contributed to all these jab deaths.
 
Last edited:
i get the point being made, but (you'll not be surprised to know) i don't see the relevance. in fact i think its pretty fucking depressing.

how many people with cancer die of cancer. how many people with a whole host of terrible diseases die of that specific disease. i'm sure we've all lost loved ones from our life where the ultimate cause of death was the thing that tipped them over, but not the thing that brought them to the edge. think of that first wave of care home deaths. how many of those would have covid as the only cause of death - i reckon a very very small percentage. i suspect the motivation behind this FOI, and this thread, wants to turn a blind eye to that.

is the point being made here that vulnerable people don't matter, that as a society we shouldn't protect them? how many people, comfortably managing a comorbidity, would still be here if covid hadn't come along? or do we just ignore all of those people, and say their life doesn't merit protection? if you presumably agree it does , then you need to draw your line (how many deaths), beyond which we allow the authorities to intervene.
 
The old people were tricked into signing DNR forms then given the euthanasia drug that Boris spent hundreds of millions on from France.

l forget its actually name, is it something like midazolam or a similar name ?
 
Adumass said:
i get the point being made, but (you'll not be surprised to know) i don't see the relevance. in fact i think its pretty fucking depressing.

how many people with cancer die of cancer. how many people with a whole host of terrible diseases die of that specific disease. i'm sure we've all lost loved ones from our life where the ultimate cause of death was the thing that tipped them over, but not the thing that brought them to the edge. think of that first wave of care home deaths. how many of those would have covid as the only cause of death - i reckon a very very small percentage. i suspect the motivation behind this FOI, and this thread, wants to turn a blind eye to that.

is the point being made here that vulnerable people don't matter, that as a society we shouldn't protect them? how many people, comfortably managing a comorbidity, would still be here if covid hadn't come along? or do we just ignore all of those people, and say their life doesn't merit protection? if you presumably agree it does , then you need to draw your line (how many deaths), beyond which we allow the authorities to intervene.
Click to expand...
You make a very good point but you fail to address the OP. All the shit and hardship. All the money we, as tax payers will be paying to the Tory donors, the the money lost from dodgy furlough claims that the torys won’t bother trying to get back and not once did this government attempt to protect the very people you speak about. In fact it was quite the opposite.
 
Richardvanles said:
All the money we, as tax payers will be paying to the Tory donors, the the money lost from dodgy furlough claims that the torys won’t bother trying to get back and not once did this government attempt to protect the very people you speak about. In fact it was quite the opposite.
Click to expand...
you'll get no argument from me on any of those points, i completely agree. 100%.

you'd like to think the public enquiry would hold them to account, but we all know that "lessons will be learned" and that will be the end of it.
 
Adumass said:
i get the point being made, but (you'll not be surprised to know) i don't see the relevance. in fact i think its pretty fucking depressing.

how many people with cancer die of cancer. how many people with a whole host of terrible diseases die of that specific disease. i'm sure we've all lost loved ones from our life where the ultimate cause of death was the thing that tipped them over, but not the thing that brought them to the edge. think of that first wave of care home deaths. how many of those would have covid as the only cause of death - i reckon a very very small percentage. i suspect the motivation behind this FOI, and this thread, wants to turn a blind eye to that.

is the point being made here that vulnerable people don't matter, that as a society we shouldn't protect them? how many people, comfortably managing a comorbidity, would still be here if covid hadn't come along? or do we just ignore all of those people, and say their life doesn't merit protection? if you presumably agree it does , then you need to draw your line (how many deaths), beyond which we allow the authorities to intervene.
Click to expand...
All true but this happens every winter. The old and the frail, all brought to this point by various illnesses, die during winter. For many it is just 'their time', for others it simply hastens the process. Influenza leads to pneumonia, 'the old mans friend'.

If you want to protect the 'vulnerable' there are many things that can be done (but probably won't), better health care involving education about diet, vitamins, lifestyle and the rest but shutting down the NHS and a working (if imperfect) society is not the answer.

The crime here is not covid, like any winter 'ailment' it was going to kill tens of thousands of people, but the reaction of the authorities to to a rather unpleasant but 'regular' winter virus, reaction that may well have killed more people than the virus itself.
 
arguably omicron is a 'regular' winter virus, and i agree that we will learn to live with it and be better prepared for it.

but also arguably the earlier variants were anything but 'regular'. they were new, without any effective treatments or strategies (i'm talking 2020, before vaccines, before ivermectin, whilst ventilators were being used etc). if those variants had been allowed to run wild, like other 'regular' winter viruses then the increased death rate would have been unimaginable IMO. (i know you don't trust the figures, with your double flu season narrative, so we will have to agree to disagree on this point, rather than replay the argument).
 
Adumass said:
arguably omicron is a 'regular' winter virus, and i agree that we will learn to live with it and be better prepared for it.

but also arguably the earlier variants were anything but 'regular'. they were new, without any effective treatments or strategies (i'm talking 2020, before vaccines, before ivermectin, whilst ventilators were being used etc). if those variants had been allowed to run wild, like other 'regular' winter viruses then the increased death rate would have been unimaginable IMO. (i know you don't trust the figures, with your double flu season narrative, so we will have to agree to disagree on this point, rather than replay the argument).
Click to expand...
sorry but thats nonsense.

its a total 100% scam, its been proven every single way possible.

check out the report I've just shared.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top